Recent posts

03 Feb 2025
5 min read
by YINI Editorial team
Lactose intolerance

Mistaken self-diagnosis of lactose intolerance denies many the benefits of dairy products

EFSA ibd Lactose Lactose digestion Lactose intolerance
Related posts
See More
Our Resources
Table of contents
Table of contents

Many people needlessly avoid dairy products because they mistake their symptoms for lactose intolerance, new research reveals. As a result, individuals with self-diagnosed lactose intolerance often avoid dairy products, which are primary sources of essential nutrients like calcium, vitamin D, and riboflavin. This avoidance can lead to deficiencies in these nutrients, which are crucial for bone health, other physiological functions and overall well-being (2).

They miss out on some key nutritional benefits, say the researchers who are calling on health professionals to educate patients on how to manage symptoms without compromising their healthy diet.

The researchers suggest that lactose intolerance is less common than generally perceived, because many people wrongly diagnose themselves with the condition when they have irritable bowel syndrome (IBS).

Around 10% of people worldwide suffer from IBS, which can cause distressing symptoms that can easily be confused for lactose intolerance.

The latest systematic review compared the reliability of self-reported lactose intolerance with confirmed cases in people with IBS (1). Their findings highlight the need for accurate diagnosis and management of lactose intolerance to avoid unnecessary dietary restrictions.

Measuring self-reported versus confirmed lactose intolerance

In most people, lactose is broken down by lactase enzymes in the small intestine. However, in people with lactase deficiency, lactose is broken down by bacteria in the large intestine, producing gases including hydrogen. This hydrogen is then absorbed into the bloodstream, exhaled through the lungs, and can be measured using a hydrogen breath test (3).

With this in mind, researchers set out to review the diagnostic accuracy of self-reported lactose intolerance in adults with IBS. They analysed the results of six observational studies with 845 participants, comparing self-reported symptoms with objective hydrogen breath testing for lactose malabsorption.

The accuracy of self-reported lactose intolerance varies widely

Results showed significant variability in the accuracy of self-reporting for diagnosing lactose intolerance among people with IBS. There was a large gap between self-reported and confirmed cases according to hydrogen breath testing:

  • Less than half (38%) of participants had lactose intolerance identified through both self-reporting and hydrogen breath testing
  • Conversely, 16% of participants self-reported as lactose intolerant but were tolerant according to hydrogen breath testing
  • Another 16% of participants were lactose tolerant according to both self-reporting and hydrogen breath testing
  • Just over a quarter of participants (27%) self-reported as lactose tolerant but were intolerant according to hydrogen breath testing

Self-reporting of lactose intolerance identifies a high number of false positives

Study findings demonstrated a high prevalence of lactose intolerance across different populations, emphasizing the need for effective dietary and clinical management strategies. However, there were also high numbers of false positives:

  • Self-reporting correctly identified 68% of participants who were truly lactose intolerant
  • However, self-reporting only correctly identified 36% of participants who were not lactose intolerant

These results suggest that many people may incorrectly perceive themselves as lactose intolerant. Symptoms of IBS and lactose intolerance were very similar across studies. This highlights the complexity of diagnosing lactose intolerance in IBS patients based on symptoms alone.

People with lactose intolerance may still be able to consume dairy products

Based on their findings, the researchers propose that lactose-free diets should not be recommended without clear indications of lactose intolerance. Research indicates that people who perceive themselves as lactose intolerant can often consume dairy foods without symptoms (3). In fact, the unnecessary exclusion of dairy products can result in an imbalanced diet, affecting not only bone health but also other physiological functions that depend on these nutrients (2,5,6). The EFSA recommends that individuals with lactose intolerance should not completely avoid dairy products but rather manage their intake to avoid symptoms while ensuring adequate nutrient intake…  to prevent nutrient deficiencies and maintain diet quality (4).

Even people with clinically confirmed lactose intolerance can still consume dairy foods with proper guidance to meet nutrient recommendations. Unabsorbed lactose offers significant health benefits including promoting the growth of beneficial bifidobacteria in the gut and improving calcium absorption, which is essential for maintaining strong bones and teeth(7). Supplementation with Bifidobacteria and galacto-oligosaccharides (GOS) can improve lactose digestion and tolerance. This is due to the ability of these probiotics and prebiotics to modify the gut microbiota and enhance the fermentation of undigested lactose. This pre and probiotics approach allow to avoid dairy exclusion (7).

Avoiding dairy foods without proper medical advice can lead to unnecessary dietary restrictions and potential nutrient deficiencies. It is therefore important for healthcare providers to diagnose lactose intolerance accurately and educate patients on managing symptoms without compromising their nutritional status, say the researchers.

What is the difference between lactose intolerance and lactose malabsorption?

Lactose intolerance happens when the body doesn’t produce enough lactase, the enzyme needed for lactose digestion. Without enough lactase, consuming dairy foods can lead to uncomfortable symptoms such as bloating, gas, and diarrhoea.

There are two different types of lactose intolerance (8,9):

  • Congenital lactose intolerance – lactose intolerance from birth, due to a genetic inability to produce lactase.
  • Lactose malabsorption – can occur temporarily due to secondary causes like infectious gastroenteritis, cow’s milk allergy, and coeliac disease. Once these underlying conditions are addressed, lactase activity typically returns to normal levels, allowing for the proper digestion of lactose.

While congenital lactose intolerance is extremely rare, lactose malabsorption is relatively common, affecting up to half of European adults (4).

“A lactose-free diet should not be routinely recommended for IBS patients… Future investigations should focus on gaining a better understanding of the factors involved in lactose perception and tolerance.”

Pop A, et al., 2024

References
  1. (1) Pop A, et al. Self-Perceived Lactose Intolerance Versus Confirmed Lactose Intolerance in Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Systematic Review. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2024 Sep 9. doi: 10.15403/jgld-5836.
  2. (2) Dominici, S., Donati, N., Menabue, S. et al. The impact of lactose intolerance diagnosis: costs, timing, and quality-of-life. Intern Emerg Med (2024).
  3. (3) Dainese R, Casellas F, Mariné-Barjoan E, et al. Perception of lactose intolerance in irritable bowel syndrome patients. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014;26:1167–1175.
  4. (4) EFSA, Scientific Opinion on lactose thresholds in lactose intolerance and galactosaemia, EFSA Journal 2010;8(9):1777
  5. (5) Savaiano DA, Boushey CJ, McCabe GP. Lactose Intolerance Symptoms Assessed by Meta-Analysis: A Grain of Truth That Leads to Exaggeration. J Nutr 2006;136:1107–1113.
  6. (6) Casellas F, Aparici A, Pérez MJ, Rodríguez P. Perception of lactose intolerance impairs health-related quality of life. Eur J Clin Nutr 2016;70:1068–1072.
  7. (7) Mysore Saiprasad S, Moreno OG, Savaiano DA. A Narrative Review of Human Clinical Trials to Improve Lactose Digestion and Tolerance by Feeding Bifidobacteria or Galacto-Oligosacharides. Nutrients 2023;15:3559.
  8. (8) Toca MDC, Fernández A, Orsi M, Tabacco O, Vinderola G. Lactose intolerance: myths and facts. An update. Arch Argent Pediatr 2022;120:59–66.
  9. (9) Al-Beltagi M, Saeed NK, Bediwy AS, Elbeltagi R. Cow’s milk-induced gastrointestinal disorders: From infancy to adulthood. World J Clin Pediatr 2022;11:437-454
27 Jan 2025
5 min read
by YINI Editorial team
Nutri-dense food

Unlocking the hidden secrets of dairy products: how a tiny component might benefit our health

dairy gut health lipids MFGM milk phospholipids
Related posts
See More
Our Resources
Table of contents
Table of contents

Milk is more than just a nutritious food—its structure hides components that may have significant health effects. Among these is the milk fat globule membrane (MFGM), a three-layer membrane that surrounds fat globules in milk. Scientists are only just beginning to understand the value of this tiny component in our health.

A comprehensive literature review, conducted by food scientists at the University College Cork, Ireland and Ohio State University, USA explores the potential of MFGM as a bioactive food ingredient (1). The review brings to light mechanisms underlying the bioactive effects of MFGM ingredients on human health.

What is the milk fat globule membrane?

The MFGM is a complex structure comprising a phospholipid tri-layer surrounding proteins, cholesterol, and other lipids (2). It originates during milk production in the mammary glands, enveloping fat droplets to stabilise them in the aqueous environment of milk. Studies have shown that this membrane protects the fat droplets from an early degradation in the stomach, which allows a more gradual absorption of fat (3).  

This complex structure is composed of a variety of bioactive compounds, which content vary in literature in the different types of dairy foods due to the natural variability of milk composition, and laboratory techniques for isolation and purification (4):

  • Polar Lipids : Phospholipids – are important for the stability of the milk fat globule, forming an emulsion to protect globules from breaking down or combining (5) and  Sphingolipids – may be significant in neonatal digestion for delivery of other key components such as ceramides and sphingosine (6), mainly composed of sphingomyelin, a molecule not present in polar lipids from vegetal sources.
  • Neutral lipids like sterols, mainly free cholesterol embedded in the membrane, which is known to be essential for membrane integrity, permeability, rigidity, and functionality. (7)
  • Proteins – found within the MFGM are diverse; some are found in the inner layer while others are contained within the outer membrane. Some of them are enzymes know as forming a complex that influence the structure and stability of MFGM (8), while individual proteins have significant functions in digestion (9)
  • Glycolipids – such as gangliosides or glycosphingolipids. First ones are known for their role in brain development and function, and particularly formation of neural connections, and the second one contributing to cell recognition, integrity of cell membranes among other roles.

The components of MFGM have several health benefits

The components of MFGM – particularly its phospholipids and proteins – have shown bioactive properties in various studies, including clinical trials. These bioactive effects range from supporting brain development to enhancing gut health and immunity.

  • Gut health: MFGM sphingolipids have demonstrated anti-inflammatory effects in the intestine through a reduction in inflammatory markers. MFGM may therefore help reduce gut permeability and maintain homeostasis (10)
  • Gut microbiome: Specific components of the MFGM can help promote the growth of probiotic bacteria such as Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus rhamnosus during digestion (10)
  • Immunity: Several biologically active components of the MFGM have immunomodulatory properties and may play a role in reducing bacterial or viral infection by binding to pathogens (11)
  • Brain health: Sphingolipids in MFGM are associated with structural and cognitive development of the brain in infants and can also improve cognitive impairment due to stress and age through reductions in neural apoptosis and promotion of neurogenesis – needed for healthy development and maintenance of the brain (12)
  • Postprandial lipemia: science is currently trying to elucidate the MFGM modulatory role on postprandial lipemia. This is particularly important because postprandial hyperlipemia is recognized as an independent risk factor for metabolic and cardiovascular diseases.

Applications and challenges of MFGM in nutrition

Use of MFGM in nutritional products has received great attention in recent years. The two main sources of MFGM are cream and whey found in milk, yogurt, fresh cheese or as byproduct of cheese manufacturing. Several commercially available MFGM-enriched ingredients are available, such as buttermilk powder and whey protein concentrate. Manufacturers are also adding MFGM to infant nutrition formulas with the aim of supporting immune function and cognitive development.

Meanwhile, researchers are still unravelling how differences in the composition of the MFGM affect its bioactive potential. In addition, structural changes that occur during dairy processing may affect the properties of the MFGM.

  • Variability in composition: The composition of MFGM can vary based on factors such as the source of dairy product, leading to differences in its biological properties
  • Processing effects: Dairy processing such as homogenisation, pasteurisation, sterilisation, heat treatment may impact the structure of MFGM, breaking it into fragments and potentially affecting its bioactive potential

The future of MFGM research

The researchers conclude that we still to further understand the effects of food processing, source and composition on the biological functioning of the MFGM. They recommend further studies of interactions between the MFGM and other components in various dairy food matrixes such as yogurt, infant formula, or milk. As we learn more, MFGM holds the potential to unlock new ways to promote health, from infancy to adulthood.

“The MFGM is a unique complex with many components that have demonstrated effects on brain, gut, and immune health and development.”

Wilmot L, et al., 2024

References
  1. (1) Wilmot L, Miller C, Patil I, Kelly AL, Jimenez-Flores R. The relevance of a potential bioactive ingredient: The milk fat globule membrane. J Dairy Sci. 2024 Oct 14:S0022-0302(24)01227-X
  2. (2) Brink LR and Lönnerdal B; 2020. Milk fat globule membrane: the role of its various components in infant health and development. The Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry, 85:108465
  3. (3) Demmer E et al. Addition of a dairy fraction rich in milk fat globule membrane to a high-saturated fat meal reduces the postprandial insulinaemic and inflammatory response in overweight and obese adults. J Nutr Sci. 2016 Mar 7;5:e14
  4. (4) Castro-Gómez MP et al. Total milk fat extraction and quantification of polar and neutral lipids of cow, goat, and ewe milk by using a pressurized liquid system and chromatographic techniques. J Dairy Sci. 2014 Nov;97(11):6719-28.
  5. (5) Thum C, Roy NC, Everett DW, and McNabb WC. 2023. Variation in milk fat globule size and composition: A source of bioactives for human health. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 63(1):87–113
  6. (6) Lopez CE. et al. 2023. Solubilization of free β-sitosterol in milk sphingomyelin and polar lipid vesicles as carriers: Structural characterization of the membranes and sphingosome morphology. Food Research International, 165:112496
  7. (7) Lu J et al. The protein and lipid composition of the membrane of milk fat globules depends on their size. J Dairy Sci. 2016 Jun;99(6):4726-4738
  8. (8) Bertram Y. Fong, Carmen S. Norris, Alastair K.H. MacGibbon, Protein and lipid composition of bovine milk-fat-globule membrane, International Dairy Journal, 2007, Volume 17 (4) : 275-288, ISSN 0958-6946.
  9. (9) Sun Y, et al. 2023. Changes in interfacial composition and structure of milk fat globules are crucial regulating lipid digestion in simulated in vitro infant gastrointestinal digestion. Food Hydrocolloids, [online] 134:108003
  10. (10) Wu Z, et al. 2022. Milk Fat Globule Membrane Attenuates Acute Colitis and Secondary Liver Injury by Improving the Mucus Barrier and Regulating the Gut Microbiota. Front. Immunol. 13:865273
  11. (11) Guerin J, et al. 2018. Adhesive interactions between milk fat globule membrane and Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG inhibit bacterial attachment to Caco-2 TC7 intestinal cell. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 167:44–53
  12. (12) Zhou Y, et al. 2023. Improvement of Spatial Memory and Cognitive Function in Mice via the Intervention of Milk Fat Globule Membrane. Nutrients 15:534.
20 Jan 2025
4 min read
by YINI Editorial team
Elderly Expert interviews

Adherence to healthy dietary pattern at midlife is a cornerstone to ensure healthy aging until the age 70

diets elderly healthy aging midlife Tessier
Related posts
See More
Our Resources
Table of contents
Table of contents

Interview with Anne-Julie Tessier, PhD, RD

We are pleased to welcome Dr. Anne-Julie Tessier, postdoctoral Fellow in the Department of Nutrition at Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, USA. We had the pleasure to meet her during the ASN Nutrition Congress 2024, where she presented her work about the optimal dietary patterns for healthy aging, highlighting key findings from her work in two large US prospective cohort studies.

In these studies, healthy aging was defined as surviving to age 70 years while maintaining good cognitive function, physical function, mental health, and free of chronic diseases. To evaluate the impact of each dietary patterns, the researchers compared rates of healthy aging among people in the highest versus lowest quintiles for adherence to each of eight healthy dietary patterns that have been defined by previous scientific studies. They also looked at the food group contribution to healthy aging, independently from the diet pattern.
In this interview, she provides comments on her work on optimal dietary patterns for healthy aging. Dietary patterns seem to be correlated with healthy aging and yogurt may have an interesting role to play

Key messages

  • Even after considering physical activity and other health-related factors, the connection between diet and healthy aging remained strong. Anne-Julie Tessier pointed out that each healthy diet was associated with overall healthy aging, as well as specific aspects like physical health, cognitive function, and mental well-being. This highlights the importance of dietary pattern choices for long-term health outcomes,
  • Among the studied dietary patterns, the diet rated with the highest Alternative Healthy Eating Index (AHEI) showed the strongest association with healthy aging. This pattern reflects close adherence to the Dietary Guidelines for Americans. It emphasizes the consumption of fruits, vegetables, whole grains, and unsaturated fats. Individuals following diets with higher AHEI scores had an 84% greater chance of achieving healthy aging at 70 years.
  • Higher intakes of fruits, vegetables, whole grains, unsaturated fats, nuts, legumes, and low-fat dairy were associated with greater odds of healthy aging.
  • On top of the diet quality, the study observed that higher yogurt intake was positively associated with improved chances of healthy aging.

Can you tell us about yourself and your scientific work?

I am a registered dietitian, currently working as a Postdoctoral Fellow in the Department of Nutrition at Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health. My research focuses on the epidemiological aspects of nutrition, particularly the relationship between nutrition, metabolomics, cognition, and sarcopenia in aging. Additionally, I am involved in developing and evaluating novel mobile applications for dietary assessment.

What was the primary objective of the study on dietary patterns and healthy aging?

We aimed to look at the effects of long-term adherence to 8 healthy diets in midlife, such as Mediterranean diet or the Planetary Health diet, on chances of achieving healthy aging at the age of 70 years.

Which dietary pattern showed the strongest association with healthy aging?

People who had higher adherence to all healthy diets in midlife were 43-84% more likely to achieve healthy aging compared to those who had lower adherence. This suggests that what you eat in midlife can play a big role in how well you age.

The leading healthy diet was the diet with the highest Alternative Healthy Eating Index (AHEI), which was associated with 84% greater chances of healthy aging at 70 years and 2.2 times higher chances at 75 years. A higher AHEI score reflects a diet that aligns with the Dietary Guidelines for Americans; it emphasizes fruits, vegetables, whole grains, and unsaturated fats.

What food groups were positively associated with greater odds of healthy aging?

Among dietary factors, eating more fruits, vegetables, whole grains, healthy fats, nuts, beans, and low-fat dairy products was associated with better chances of healthy aging. On the other hand, eating more trans fats, salty foods, and meats was linked to lower chances of aging healthily.

Any specific observations regarding yogurt?

Yes, a higher intake in yogurt was associated with greater chances of healthy aging and of its domains encompassing cognitive, physical, mental health and living free of chronic diseases.

Future research could help to elucidate the potential impacts of switching to a healthier dietary pattern later in life.  

13 Jan 2025
3 min read
by YINI Editorial team
Fermentation benefits Q&A

Focus on vitamin K

fermentatio gut microbiota lactic acid bacteria vitamin K
Related posts
See More
Our Resources
Table of contents
Table of contents

Vitamin K is mostly known for its role on blood coagulation. But did you know that bacteria play a key role for this vitamin? Let’s dig more…

What is vitamin K?

Vitamin K is a fat-soluble vitamin, stored in our body in fat tissue and the liver. It is mostly present in two forms:

  • Phylloquinones (vitamin K1), synthesised by plants (as one of the components of the chloroplasts). Vitamin K1 is found primarily in green leafy vegetables.
  • Menaquinones or Vitamin K2, which bacterially synthesised. It is found mainly in the human gut microbiota, synthetised by the micro-organism of the microbiota. It is also found in fermented foods such as fermented beans and fermented dairy (cheese, butter, yogurt).

Vitamin K is necessary for the synthesis of coagulation factors (proteins that help control bleeding) and therefore normal coagulation. The “K” comes from its German name, “Koagulationsvitamin”.

In many countries, newborns receive vitamin K to prevent the possibility of bleeding, particularly in the brain. Indeed, the newborns do not get enough vitamin K from breast milk and as their gut microbiota is unmature, the synthesis of vitamin K2 due to fermentation is not sufficient to cover the needs.

Vitamin K also plays an important role in bone health. People who have higher levels of vitamin K have greater bone density, while low levels of vitamin K have been found in those with osteoporosis. Similarly, some studies suggest that low levels of vitamin K are associated with a higher risk of osteoarthritis.

Research shows that vitamin K may play other roles mainly in cardiovascular health.

Dietary recommendations

Dietary reference values (DRVs) for vitamin K is at:

  • 70 μg/day for adults including for pregnant and lactating women,
  • 65 μg/day for adolescents aged 15–17,
  • 45 μg/day for children aged 11–14,
  • 30 μg/day for children aged 7–10,
  • 20 μg/day for children aged 4–6,
  • 12 μg/day for children aged 1–3 years and
  • 10 μg/day for infants aged 7–11 months.

Source of vitamin K

It is known that green leafy vegetables, such as lettuce, spinach, cabbage and plant oils such as olive and rapeseed oil are sources of vitamin K:

  • Kale or Spinach = 390 μg/100g
  • Brocolis = 102 μg/100g
  • Avocado = 21 μg/100g
  • Olive oil = 53 μg/100g

Menaquinones or Vitamin K2 is bacterially synthesised. Recent research and the knowledge evolution on fermentation and bacteria shows that dairy products are a good source of K2.

A recent US study shows that K2 was more prevalent in the higher fat dairy and processing conditions can affect the K2 content (starter cultures, fermentation process, fat content). Vitamin K2 is found in considerable levels in cheese, with high variations across the cheese varieties.

Focus on the fermentation

The bacteria of yogurt and fermented milks can produce menaquinones (vitamin K-2).

Different strains of bacteria produce different types of menaquinones (e.g., MK-4, MK-7, MK-9):

  • Lactobacillus species produce various forms of menaquinones (MK-4, MK-7, and MK-9)
  • Streptococcus thermophilus is primarily involved in the initial stages of fermentation, creating an environment that supports the growth of other bacteria
  • Other Lactic Acid Bacteria (LAB) such as LactococcusLeuconostoc, and Pediococcus, used in dairy fermentation, can produce different menaquinones

References
06 Jan 2025
5 min read
by YINI Editorial team
Benefits for planet health

Balancing nutrition and nature: why cutting the animal protein in our diets has mixed environmental impacts

animal food environment proteins sustainable diet vegetable
Related posts
See More
Our Resources
Table of contents
Table of contents

Shrinking the share of animal protein in our diet has become a focus for protecting both human and planetary health. But, while reducing animal protein is set to ease pressures on the environment, it could also come at a cost, latest research reveals (1).

If not carefully designed, our low animal protein diet could spell bad news for the wealth of the world’s fauna and flora which could fall victim to the changing agricultural practices.

The findings, based on diet modelling, have led researchers to call for further research into the best balance of animal-sourced protein in our shift towards more sustainable, plant-based diets. The modern diet should take account of all influences on sustainable eating and may require radical changes in our agriculture, the researchers say.

Modelling sustainable diets for human and planetary health

Environmental pressures created by the global food system are driven mainly by the high proportion of animal products in our diet (2). Reducing the share of animal-based foods we eat could therefore bring major benefits to the environment (3) and is a key target of food policies to increase sustainability (4,5). But because animal products are such an important source of protein and micronutrients, cutting down on them also risks making the diet less affordable or acceptable (6,7). Optimized diets may have difficulty to meet the requirement for certain nutrients (calcium, vit. B6 or B12, vit D, iodin), some of them being specific animal-sourced micro-nutrients.

Adding to this dilemma, a team of French scientists has shone a spotlight on the pros and cons for the environment of reducing animal protein in our diet (1).

They previously explored the minimum share of animal protein that met all food nutrient recommendation (8). For this new publication, using a national database of French adults’ diets, they developed five model low-animal-protein diets for different groups of adults based on gender and age. The observed diet is not fulfilling all nutrient recommendations, but these low-animal-protein diets contained the least animal protein needed to fulfil nutritional needs – around 50% of dietary protein – while minimising changes in the quantity and affordability of food consumed.

A low animal protein diet contains more fruits and vegetables (+103%), pulses, potatoes and unrefined grain products (+142%), more eggs (+96%), more dairy products but with variations within this category, with more milk (+222%), the same quantity of yogurt and less cheese (-97%) and of course, less meat –66%).

Tracking ecological impacts from field to fork

The researchers then used a lifecycle assessment to compare the environmental impacts of model low-animal-protein diets with those of typical French observed diets, where around 70% of protein is from animal sources. This method tracked various ecological effects from ‘field-to-fork’, including farming, processing, packaging, transport, retail, consumer use, and waste disposal. Here’s what they found…

Cutting down on animal protein has positive effects on the environment

Results suggested that reducing the share of animal protein from 70% to 50% of total protein intake could significantly ease several key environmental pressures. Differences between typical and low-animal-protein diets were similar for each of the five groups of adults studied:

  • Greenhouse gas emissions (GHGE): The levels of GHGEs fell by 30% in the modelled low-animal-protein diets, potentially helping to curb climate change.
  • Acidification: Emissions of acidifying gases, which can damage soil and water quality, fell by 40%.
  • Land occupation: The area of land needed for food production shrank by 35% with low-animal-protein diets.
  • Energy demand: The energy consumed throughout the life cycle of food products dropped by 24%.
  • Marine eutrophication: Nutrient runoff into marine environments, due to the emission of nitrogen compounds, fell by 13%.

Reducing animal protein can also have harmful environmental impacts

On the down-side, the researchers uncovered some concerning trade-offs that could occur with low-animal-protein diets, particularly in water use and biodiversity:

  • Freshwater eutrophication: Nutrient runoff into freshwater environments, due to the emission of nitrogen or phosphorus compounds, rose by 36% with low-animal-protein diets.
  • Water use: There was a 41% rise in the amount of water needed for food production associated with low-animal-protein diets.
  • Biodiversity loss: The estimated loss of species associated with changes in land use due to food production soared by 66% with low-animal-protein diets.

How can we balance these mixed environmental impacts?

The results of this modelling study suggest that cutting the share of animal protein we eat to 50% is compatible with nutritional needs, affordability and consumption constraints, but could have mixed effects on the environment. Therefore, any shift toward low-animal-protein diets should be carefully managed to balance these environmental trade-offs.

When designing sustainable diets, while covering all nutrient requirements of a population (taking into account age, gender and physical status specificities) it is important to consider all aspects of sustainability, the researchers say. In the modelling, they found that environmental benefits were driven by decreases in red meat consumption while introducing the concern on its impact on biodiversity. Increased consumption of fresh fruits, vegetables and fatty fish explained most environmental challenges related to water use.

The researchers propose that shifting the shares of plant and animal products in diets may require transforming agricultural practices and food systems to address concerns about climate change, biodiversity preservation and water consumption.

“While shifting toward a more plant-based diet is promoted, especially in Western countries, the optimal share of animal protein compatible with a sustainable diet has yet to be determined.”

Aubin J, et al., 2024

References
  1. (1) Aubin J, Vieux F, Le Féon S, Tharrey M, Peyraud JL, Darmon N. Environmental trade-offs of meeting nutritional requirements with a lower share of animal protein for adult subpopulations. Animal. 2024 May 10:101182.
  2. (2) Xu, X., Sharma, P., Shu, S., Lin, T.-S., Ciais, P., Tubiello, F.N., Smith, P., Campbell, N., Jain, A.K., 2021. Global greenhouse gas emissions from animal-based foods are twice those of plant-based foods. Nature Food 2, 724–732
  3. (3) Springmann, M., Wiebe, K., Mason-D’Croz, D., Sulser, T.B., Rayner, M., Scarborough, P., 2018. Health and nutritional aspects of sustainable diet strategies and their association with environmental impacts: a global modelling analysis with country-level detail. Lancet Planet Health 2, e451–e461.
  4. (4) Lonnie, M., Johnstone, A.M., 2020. The public health rationale for promoting plant protein as an important part of a sustainable and healthy diet. Nutrition Bulletin 45, 281–293
  5. (5) Willett, W., et al., 2019. Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT-Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems. Lancet (london, England) 393, 447–492.
  6. (6) Fehér, A., Gazdecki, M., Véha, M., Szakály, M., Szakály, Z., 2020. A comprehensive review of the benefits of and the barriers to the switch to a plant-based diet. Sustainability 12, 4136.
  7. (7) Monsivais, P., Scarborough, P., Lloyd, T., Mizdrak, A., Luben, R., Mulligan, A.A., Wareham, N.J., Woodcock, J., 2015. Greater accordance with the dietary approaches to stop hypertension dietary pattern is associated with lower diet-related greenhouse gas production but higher dietary costs in the United Kingdom. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 102, 138–145
  8. (8) Vieux F, Rémond D, Peyraud JL, Darmon N, Approximately half of total protein intake by adults must be animal-based to meet non-protein nutrient-based recommendations with variation due to age and sex, Journal of Nutrition, 152 (2022), pp. 2514-2525
16 Dec 2024
4 min read
by YINI Editorial team
Cardiovascular health Nutri-dense food

Understanding the dairy-fat matrix: how does whole-fat dairy affect cardiometabolic health?

dairy fats lipids matrix
Related posts
See More
Our Resources
Table of contents
Table of contents

A new US study has challenged the long-standing belief that whole-fat dairy foods can harm heart health. Instead, such foods could even be part of a healthy diet, the research suggests (1).

The findings are the latest in a growing body of evidence that calls into question dietary guidelines recommending we choose low-fat, rather than high-fat dairy products.  And it comes hot on the heels of British research suggesting that swapping saturated fats from meat with those from dairy products may help curb cardiovascular risk (2).

Questioning the link between whole fat dairy foods and heart conditions

Current dietary guidelines advise reducing the intake of whole-fat dairy, reflecting concerns about the effects of their high saturated fat content on heart health. But emerging research suggests that the relationship between whole-fat dairy foods and cardiometabolic health – conditions such as heart disease, diabetes, and obesity – might not be so straightforward.

The latest study, by researchers at the University of Vermont, sheds light on the unique structure and composition of the dairy-fat matrix and how it varies between dairy foods (1). The researchers studied whether differences in the dairy-fat matrix could help explain why individual dairy foods – milk, yogurt, cheese, and butter – might have varying effects on cardiometabolic health.

Examining the effects of dairy foods on cardiometabolic health

They analysed studies published over the past ten years, looking at how regular consumption of whole-fat dairy foods affects markers of cardiometabolic health including body weight, diabetes, inflammation, blood pressure, cholesterol levels, and the risk of developing heart disease.

The results were mixed. In most cases, no significant associations were found between eating whole-fat dairy and poor cardiometabolic outcomes. In fact, some studies suggested that whole-fat dairy foods, particularly milk and yogurt, may have beneficial effects on some cardiometabolic risk factors:

  • Milk – potentially beneficial effects on obesity
  • Yogurt – potentially beneficial effects on body weight regulation and the risk of developing obesity, type 2 diabetes (T2D) and cardiovascular disease (CVD)
  • Cheese – potentially beneficial effects on outcome measures related to T2D and CVD, such as cholesterol levels

What does this mean for our diet?

The study findings suggest that, rather than being a threat to heart health, regularly eating whole-fat dairy foods could be part of a healthy diet.

However, the researchers point to the need for more research to confirm the exact relationship between dairy foods and cardiometabolic health. They recommend further studies to understand better how dietary patterns that include plant- and animal-sourced foods, including dairy foods, contribute to nutritious diets that promote both human and planetary health.

“Evidence largely suggests no effect of consuming higher-fat varieties of dairy products on cardiometabolic health, with minor differences between individual dairy products, when stratified by both dairy product and fat content. More broadly, the current body of evidence suggests that regular fat dairy products may be a part of overall healthy eating patterns. “

Taormina VM, et al., 2024

What makes the dairy-fat matrix special?

Dairy fat is not just a single type of fat; it consists of a complex mixture of fatty acids, triglycerides, sterols, and phospholipids. These fats are all uniquely packaged into milk fat globules – tiny spheres surrounded by a membrane.

  • Fatty acids – at least 400 different dairy fatty acids have been identified. Approximately 68% of these are saturated, 27% mono-unsaturated and 4% poly-unsaturated, although these proportions can vary widely (3).
  • Triglycerides, phospholipids, and sterols – fatty acids combine to form these secondary structures. In milk, 97–98% of fatty acids are found in the form of triglycerides, with about 1% as phospholipids, and less than 1% each as sterols and free fatty acids (4).
  • The milk fat globular membrane (MFGM) – dairy fats are uniquely arranged as a globule surrounded by a distinct membrane with inner, central, and outer layers. The inner layer comprises polar lipids, the central layer of proteins, and the outer layer of phospholipids (5).

How does the dairy-fat matrix differ between foods?

In milk, the MFGM prevents the aggregation of milk fat globules, creating an emulsion and protecting the inner triglyceride core from being degraded by enzymes. However, the structure of the MFGM can be changed by processing methods, resulting in a distinct dairy-fat matrix for different dairy products. For example:

  • Milk homogenisation reduces the size of milk fat globules, leading to an overall increase in their surface area (6);
  • Yogurt and cheese fermentation creates a semi-solid milk gel with milk fat globules interspersed in a casein protein network (6,7);
  • Butter churning disrupts milk fat globules, releasing their triglyceride cores from within the MFGM to aggregate (8).

References
09 Dec 2024
4 min read
by YINI Editorial team
Fermentation benefits Q&A

Focus on ferments

fermentation Fermented food ferments probiotics
Related posts
See More
Our Resources
Table of contents
Table of contents

Yogurt is a fermented food, containing live cultures of specific bacteria. What are they? What role do they play? Let’s take a look at the fermentation and ferments’ effect on health.

What is fermentation?

Ferments are live agents, such as a bacteria or yeast, that causes fermentation, a process that has been used throughout history to preserve food, enhance the taste or the health benefits of food (1).

Many food products are the result of a fermentation carried out by bacteria and yeasts naturally found in the food or added. Cheese, yogurt, milk kefir, are dairy fermented foods (1-3).

A huge variety of fermented foods has been developed throughout history, including vegetables, cereals and breads, soybean products, fish products, and meats and we can distinguish:

  • Fermented foods without live microorganisms at the time we eat/drink them: bread, wine, cocoa or coffee beans, for instance.
  • Fermented foods with live microorganisms: sauerkraut, kimchi, kefir, yogurt, cheese, kombucha, or miso for example.

Consuming fermented food may also contribute to gut microbiota and its diversity, which is important for good health (5). The gut microbiome is composed of trillions of microorganisms that shelter in the gut and play a key role in maintaining the health of the host such as modulation of the immune system, helping to fight infections and even protecting against cancer.

The microbes in fermented food may help prevent infections by harmful bacteria in the gut by out-competing them in the gut environment.

Fermented foods consumption can exert changes to the gut microbiome in as little as 24 hours and help to minimise disruptions of gut microbiota balance

Focus on the specific ferments of yogurt

Yogurt is produced by the lactic fermentation of milk by two specific live bacteria. Lactobacillus Delbrueckii subsp. Bulgaricus and Streptococcus Thermophilus, which shall be viable, active and abundant in the product (4,7).

The fermentation process produces lactic acid by predigesting lactose into glucose and galactose resulting in the decrease of pH and the coagulation of milk casein proteins. This sets the milk into the gel-like signature texture of yogurt. Lactic acid fermentation also produces compounds such as carbon dioxide, peptides and amino acids which give yogurt its specific taste.

The decreased pH results in higher absorption of minerals such as calcium as it makes them more bioavailable.

Yogurt is also an interesting source of minerals for lactose intolerant people, as they are generally able to tolerate yogurt better than other dairy thanks to the pre-digestion of lactose, (5,6,8).

Fermentation in yogurt releases a wide range of metabolites such as:

  • Hight amount of vitamin B
  • Bioactive peptides which are antioxidants
  • Exopolysaccharides (EPS) and Conjugated Linoleic Acid (CLA) which provide health benefits such as anti-inflammatory and immune system modulatory properties.

Ferments and probiotics: the same?

Probiotics are defined as: “Live microorganisms that, when administered in adequate amounts confer a health benefit on the host”.

A fermented food may be described as a “probiotic food” only if:

  • It contains live microorganisms at the time it is eaten,
  • Those microorganisms (bacterial or yeast strains) are well defined and have shown a health benefit in a scientific study, and
  • The strains are present in the final food product in sufficient numbers to confer the health benefit.

In the case of yogurt, the live cultures do provide health benefits. Several studies show that yogurt with live active cultures may significantly enhance lactose digestion and reduce symptoms of intolerance in people with lactose maldigestion.

The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) has approved the claim that yogurt improves digestion of lactose. According to EFSA, yogurt must contain at least 108 Colony Forming Units (CFU) of live microorganisms ((L. bulgaricus and S. thermophilus) per gram of yogurt, to obtain these probiotic beneficial effects (9).

See also

References
02 Dec 2024
4 min read
by YINI Editorial team
Children Other studies Publications

Yogurt consumption is associated with a reduced risk of childhood eczema and allergies

allergies Eczema immunity probiotic
Related posts
See More
Our Resources
Table of contents
Table of contents

Eating yogurt during pregnancy or infancy is associated with changes to the immune system that may help protect against childhood eczema and food or respiratory allergies.

Infants whose mothers eat yogurt during pregnancy have a reduced risk of eczema and respiratory allergies

Eating yogurt frequently during pregnancy is associated with a reduced risk of offspring developing eczema and respiratory allergies during infancy, according to evidence from observational studies:

A study from Japan showed that infants had a reduced risk of eczema and asthma at the age of 2 years if their mothers consumed dairy products including milk, yogurt, and cheese, during pregnancy.

In a Turkish study, eating yogurt daily during pregnancy was associated with a 78% lower risk of infants developing eczema by the age of 2 years, compared with eating yogurt less frequently.

In the USA, a study showed that eating yogurt daily during pregnancy was associated with a lower risk of infants developing eczema, asthma, or hay fever by the age of 4 years, compared with eating yogurt less frequently.

Association between regular yogurt consumption and risk of childhood eczema and allergies - YINI

Infants who regularly eat yogurt have a reduced risk of childhood eczema and food allergies

Introducing yogurt to infants during their first year of life is associated with a reduced risk of developing eczema and food allergies later in life, according to evidence from observational studies:

In a Japanese study, eating yogurt before the age of 12 months was associated with a 30% lower risk of developing eczema and a 47% lower risk of developing food sensitivity by the age of 5 years, compared with eating no yogurt.

In a European study, introducing yogurt before the age of 12 months was associated with a 59% lower risk of developing eczema by the age of 4 years, compared with no introduction.

A further New Zealand study involved infants predisposed to allergy as their parents had a history of allergy. It found that introducing yogurt in the first year of life was associated with significant reductions in eczema and food allergy at 12 months old.

The risk of developing eczema and food allergies also appears to be associated with frequency of yogurt consumption during infancy.

In one study, infants who ate yogurt daily had a lower risk of developing both eczema and food sensitivity than those who ate yogurt less frequently.

In another study, infants who ate yogurt daily or 2–6 times a week were significantly less likely to develop eczema than those who ate yogurt less than once a month.

The possible allergy-protective effects of yogurt may be due to the strains of bacteria it contains

A comparison of foods introduced in the first year of life found the protective effect against developing eczema associated with yogurt was greater than that associated with other dairy products.

A series of randomised controlled trials showed that a Lactobacillus rhamnosus probiotic supplement, given daily to infants from birth for 2 years, was associated with protection against eczema and food allergy assessed up to 11 years old.

Another interventional study found that eating yogurt containing added Lactococcus lactis probiotic strains daily for 8 weeks reduced the severity of existing eczema in children aged 2–15 years.

A large observational study found that consumption of milk containing added Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium probiotic strains by mothers during pregnancy and their infants was associated with a reduced risk of eczema at 18 months of age.

Protection against allergies may be achieved through the gut microbiota

Experts suggest that consumption of fermented dairy products during pregnancy or early infancy may protect against allergies in early childhood by increasing infant gut microbiome diversity and function; this helps to supress allergic responses.

Maternal diet may affect the infant microbiome and allergy outcomes either directly or indirectly via the maternal microbiome.

Research has reported that higher yogurt intake can increase the diversity of the gut microbiome in children and adults, and this can influence the development of the immune system to protect against allerigies.

““Growing evidence suggests that infants who regularly eat yogurt, or whose mothers frequently ate yogurt while pregnant, have a reduced risk of developing childhood eczema and allergies. This may be due in part to the allergy-protective effects of the bacteria commonly found in fermented dairy foods.” “

Professor Sharon Donovan

References
  1. (1) Donovan SM, Rao G. Health benefits of yogurt among infants and toddlers aged 4 to 24 months: a systematic review. Nutr Rev. 2019;77:478–86
  2. (2) Miyake Y, Tanaka K, Okubo H, et al. Maternal consumption of dairy products, calcium, and vitamin D during pregnancy and infantile allergic disorders. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2014;113:82–7.
  3. (3) Celik V, Beken B, Yazicioglu M, et al. Do traditional fermented foods protect against infantile atopic dermatitis. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2019;30:540–6.
  4. (4) Venter C, Palumbo MP, Glueck DH, et al. The maternal diet index in pregnancy is associated with offspring allergic diseases: the Healthy Start study. Allergy. 2022;77:162–72.
  5. (5) Shoda T, Futamura M, Yang L, et al. Yogurt consumption in infancy is inversely associated with atopic dermatitis and food sensitization at 5 years of age: A hospital-based birth cohort study. J Dermatol Sci. 2017;86:90–6.
  6. (6) Roduit C, Frei R, Loss G, et al. Development of atopic dermatitis according to age of onset and association with early-life exposures. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012;130:130–6.e5.
  7. (7) Crane J, Barthow C, Mitchell EA, et al. Is yoghurt an acceptable alternative to raw milk for reducing eczema and allergy in infancy? Clin Exp Allergy. 2018;48:604–6.
  8. (8) Wickens K, Barthow C, Mitchell EA, et al. Effects of Lactobacillus rhamnosus HN001 in early life on the cumulative prevalence of allergic disease to 11 years. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2018;29:808–14.
  9. (9) Suzuki T, Nishiyama K, Kawata K, et al. Effect of the Lactococcus Lactis 11/19-B1 Strain on Atopic Dermatitis in a Clinical Test and Mouse Model. Nutrients. 2020;12:763.
  10. (10) Bertelsen RJ, Brantsæter AL, Magnus MC, et al. Probiotic milk consumption in pregnancy and infancy and subsequent childhood allergic diseases. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014;133:165–71.e1–8.
18 Nov 2024
4 min read
by YINI Editorial team
Diabetes prevention

Probiotic fermented milk holds promise as a new tool in managing Type 2 diabetes

Fermented milk probiotic t2d type 2 diabetes
Related posts
See More
Our Resources
Table of contents
Table of contents

Probiotic fermented milk could play a valuable role in helping to tackle Type 2 diabetes. Although yet to be confirmed, early research suggests that consuming fermented milk may be linked to improvements in several key health markers of Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), including indicators of blood sugar control (1).  

As such, consuming fermented milk products may offer a helping hand in delaying the progression and reducing complications of this chronic disease.

It’s welcome news for scientists as they struggle to stem the tide of the diabetes epidemic that is sweeping across the world and placing a huge burden on individuals and society as a whole.

What is probiotic fermented milk?

Fermented milk products, such as yogurt or kefir, contain live bacteria used in fermentation that may improve gut health. They can also be enriched with probiotics – additional live bacteria that confer further health benefits. Fermented milk products have properties that help the survival and growth of these probiotics in the gut (2).

Scientists have proposed that improving gut health might help manage T2DM by affecting how the body processes sugars and fats. Mounting evidence suggests that composition of the gut bacteria may have a role in the development of T2DM by influencing insulin sensitivity, inflammatory regulation, and lipid metabolism (3). Modulating the composition of the gut microbiota through consumption of probiotics has therefore been proposed as a potential therapy for T2DM.

With this in mind, researchers set out to investigate whether probiotic fermented milk can improve key health indicators in people with T2DM, including measures of glucose and lipid metabolism and inflammatory markers. They analysed the results of ten randomised controlled trials studying the effects of probiotic-enriched fermented milk in over 250 adults with T2DM.

Probiotic fermented milk has potential to benefit the health of people with T2DM

Based on their analysis of randomised controlled trial results, the meta-analysis concluded that probiotic-enhanced fermented milk has the potential to have positive impacts on certain health markers in people with T2DM, when compared with conventional fermented milk products.

  • Blood sugar control: Consuming probiotic fermented milk was associated with significantly reduced markers of blood sugar levels, including a fall in fasting plasma glucose by an average of 17 mg/dL and glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) by 0.5%. These reductions suggest improvements in blood sugar management.
  • Cholesterol levels: in Total cholesterol levels were reduced significantly by 5.15 mg/dL in association with fermented milk consumption, indicating potential cardiovascular health benefits for people with T2DM. The effects on other lipid markers, such as triglycerides, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, were not significant.
  • Inflammation reduction: The analysis found a significant decrease in levels of the inflammatory marker C-reactive protein (CRP), suggesting a potential anti-inflammatory effect associated with probiotic fermented milk. This could be a valuable finding, since inflammation plays a crucial role in the progression of T2DM and the development of complications (4).

Beneficial effects of probiotic fermented milk in T2DM may be mediated through the gut microbiota

The exact mechanisms behind the beneficial effects of probiotic fermented milk in people with T2DM are not fully understood and probably involve several factors. The authors highlight that one explanation for such benefits might be the change to the composition of the gut microbiota caused by probiotics.

An imbalance in gut microbiota composition is common in people with T2DM, and can lead to increased intestinal permeability, allowing bacterial toxins to enter the circulation, causing inflammation and raising levels of cholesterol and blood sugar (5,6). Probiotics can restore balance to the gut microbiota by promoting the growth of beneficial bacteria and inhibiting the number of harmful bacteria (7,8).

What further research is needed?

While probiotic fermented milk shows promise in helping to manage blood sugar, cholesterol, and inflammation in people with T2DM, further research is needed to confirm these benefits.

The number of studies and participants included in the analysis was relatively small, which limits the strength of the conclusions. The trials included also varied in terms of their study design and duration, as well as the probiotic strains and comparators used, making it difficult to compare results accurately across studies. The researchers propose that larger, more standardized trials are needed to determine whether probiotic fermented milk can become a reliable part of T2DM management.

“The present findings provide a crude indication of the potential benefits of probiotic fermented milk supplementation in improving glucose and lipid metabolism and inflammation in patients with T2DM. However, more robust evidence is needed to determine the clinical significance of probiotic fermented milk in the management of T2DM. “

Zhong H, et al., 2024

References
11 Nov 2024
4 min read
Gut Health

New global guidelines unlock the effects of probiotics and prebiotics for gut health

ibd IBS Lactose NAFLD prebiotic probiotic WGO
Related posts
See More
Our Resources
Table of contents
Table of contents

New global guidelines on identifying and using probiotics and prebiotics have been drawn up in recognition of their potential benefits in supporting gut health (1).

The guidelines, published by the World Gastroenterology Organisation, reflect the growing evidence for the efficacy of specific probiotic strains or prebiotics in a variety of gastrointestinal conditions. Developed by a worldwide team of gastroenterology experts, they represent a shift in the way health professionals view these popular food ingredients.

How do we define probiotics?

Over a century ago, scientists proposed that lactic acid bacteria – commonly used for food fermentation, e.g. such as for the fermentation of milk in yogurt by the strains Streptococcus thermophilus and Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus – can provide health benefits to consumers by modifying their gut microbiota. Today, over 1,500 clinical trials have studied the effects of numerous strains of potentially probiotic bacteria on various human health outcomes. But how do we know which strains of bacteria are probiotic?

According to the World Gastroenterology Organisation, probiotics are defined as live microorganisms that confer a health benefit to humans when consumed in adequate amounts (2). Common probiotics include several strains of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium lactic acid bacteria, along with some strains of other bacteria and yeasts. In general, the term “probiotic” should be reserved for live microbial strains that have demonstrated health benefits in controlled human studies.

For more information on the health benefits of probiotics, see Scientists unravel the healthy secrets of probiotics.

How do we define prebiotics?

The concept of prebiotics – compounds that are not digested by humans but lead to health benefits by influencing the gut microbiome – is more recent (3,4). Most prebiotics are either used as food ingredients or found naturally in many foods – common examples include lactulose and oligofructose.

The World Gastroenterology Organisation defines prebiotics as selectively fermented ingredients that result in specific changes to the composition and/or activity of gut microbiota, conferring health benefits. However, the extent to which we may experience these benefits varies due to several factors, including an individual’s gut microbiota and diet.

How do probiotics and prebiotics work?

The consumption of prebiotics or probiotics is intended to influence the gut environment, which is inhabited by trillions of microbes, for the benefit of human health.

Prebiotics affect intestinal bacteria by enhancing the numbers or activities of beneficial bacteria. This may result in decreasing the population of potentially pathogenic microorganisms or reducing potentially deleterious metabolic activities of host microbiota. Prebiotics may also have an impact on immune function.

Probiotic strains may mediate health effects through one or more of several mechanisms:

  • Probiotic strains can lead to immune benefits by activating local macrophages, modulating cytokine profiles, and raising tolerance to food antigens.
  • Probiotics can also lead to improved gut health and reduced inflammation though mechanisms including food digestion, altered acidity, pathogen inhibition, and intestinal barrier enhancement.

What are the potential health benefits of probiotics or prebiotics?

Both probiotics and prebiotics have been shown to have beneficial effects on gut health. Their effects are strain- and dose-specific for probiotics and based on a particular formulation for prebiotics. Based on current evidence, the World Gastroenterology Organisation has summarized several potential health benefits:

  • Diarrhoea treatment and prevention – some probiotic strains can reduce the severity and duration of acute infectious diarrhoea in children, as well as preventing of adult and childhood diarrhoea in certain settings (5).
  • Immune response – several probiotic strains and the prebiotic oligofructose are useful in improving the immune response to infectious diseases.
  • Lactose malabsorption – Probiotic strains of Streptococcus and Lactobacillus – commonly found in yogurt – improve lactose digestion and reduce symptoms related to lactose intolerance (6).
  • Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) – some strains of probiotics may alleviate symptoms and provide pain relief from IBS.
  • Inflammatory bowel disease – certain probiotics may be effective in preventing pouchitis, inflammation in the lining of a pouch created during surgery to treat treatment of some ulcerative colitis (7).
  • Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) – certain probiotics can improve markers of liver function in adults and children with NAFLD.
  • Hepatic encephalopathy prevention and treatment – prebiotics such as lactulose are commonly used for the prevention and treatment of hepatic encephalopathy (8).

Probiotics and prebiotics have also been shown to have effects beyond gut health, including allergy prevention and benefits for skin, dental, and respiratory health.

So, what does this mean for clinical practice?

Probiotic- and prebiotic-containing products are available in many forms, most commonly as foods or supplements. Recommendations for probiotic and prebiotic use should tie specific strains or formulations to potential health benefits based on clinical studies.

Different probiotics strains have unique properties that may account for their particular health benefits. However, scientists are increasingly recognising that some mechanisms of probiotic activity may be shared among strains.

“‘The administration or use of prebiotics or probiotics is intended to influence the gut environment, which is inhabited by trillions of microbes, for the benefit of human health. Both probiotics and prebiotics have been shown to have beneficial effects that extend beyond the gut.’”

Guarner F, et al. 2024

References