Recent posts

01 Jul 2024
5 min read
Children Healthy Diets & Lifestyle Nutri-dense food

Can dairy foods contribute to teens’ nutrient intakes?

calcium children dairy micronutrients nutrient
Related posts
See More
Our Resources
Table of contents
Table of contents

Dietary strategies must be devised to target teenagers who are commonly falling short of their nutrient intake requirements, according to research from the Republic of Ireland.

Nutritionists have discovered a concerning trend that many teenagers in Western countries have shortfalls in their diet of micronutrients needed for this critical period of physical and cognitive growth and development (1). Eating dairy foods as part of a balanced and environmentally sustainable diet may help to provide a key source of micronutrients vital for teenage health and wellbeing, the research suggests.

Assessing the nutritional needs of teenagers

As they go through their teenage years, young folk have increasing independence over their food choices and eating behaviour. However, nutrient intakes are not always uppermost in teens’ minds when making their food choices, with potential consequences for health into adulthood (2).

To find out whether teens are getting enough nutrients from their diet, nutrition researchers from Cork, Ireland delved into the micronutrient intakes of teenagers and their implications for public health.

The researchers examined data from recent surveys on micronutrient intakes among teenagers in Europe, Canada, the United States, Australia and New Zealand. They found that Western teenagers are consistently failing to meet recommended intake levels for vitamins A, C, D and E, along with folate, calcium, iron, magnesium, zinc and potassium. This could have far-reaching consequences for bone health, cognitive function, and immunity.

What are the nutritional needs of teenagers?

Micronutrients play vital roles in the health and development of teenagers by contributing to a wide range of critical functions in the body (3):

  • Vitamin D, calcium, magnesium, and phosphorus – essential for building bone mass and bone health
  • Vitamins A and C – necessary for the development of cells, cell integrity and tissue repair
  • Vitamin B and folate – important for growth, DNA synthesis and cell division
  • Iron – essential for the transport of oxygen, with increased requirements during teenage years
  • Zinc – a key contributor to gene expression and regulating intracellular signalling
  • Iodine – vital for the development of neurological and cognitive skills.

Dairy foods are a key component of bone health in teenagers

Study results showed that intakes of vitamin D, calcium and magnesium are low amongst Western teenagers, with inadequate levels of vitamin D among 70–95%, calcium among 45–73%, and magnesium among 33–88% of teens.

This is important because over half of a person’s bone mass is laid down during the teenage years, requiring sufficient intakes of vitamin D, calcium and magnesium (4). Teenage bone health may be affected by low intakes of these nutrients, resulting in an increased risk of fracture and osteoporosis in later life.

According to the researchers, key sources of calcium, magnesium and vitamin D in teenagers include dairy foods, meat products and fortified cereals. Such nutrient sources should be incorporated into a healthy teenage diet.

A healthy balanced diet can help boost teenage cognitive function

Results also showed that iron and folate intake tend to be low in Western teenagers compared with recommended levels, with inadequate levels of iron and folate in 7–44% and 14–57% of teens, respectively. Iron deficiency is generally more common amongst girls than boys.

This is important because the teenage years are a period of rapid cognitive growth and development, which may be negatively impacted by low intake of folate and iron (3). Iron requirements in particular escalate throughout adolescence due to increased total blood volume and lean body composition, as well as the onset of menstruation in girls.

The researchers highlighted that a combination of dairy, meat, and cereal products provide key sources of iron and folate in teenagers, while vegetables are also an important source of folate.

Teenage diet choices influence general health and immunity

The study found that intakes of nutrients important for general health – including vitamins A, C, E, zinc and potassium – are also generally below recommended levels among Western teenagers.

Low intakes of these vitamins and minerals may result in an increased risk of impaired immunity and susceptibility to infections (5,6).

The researchers pointed out that dairy and meat products are important sources of vitamin A and zinc in teenagers, while fruit and vegetables are key sources of vitamin C. Vegetables, cereals, meat and dairy are all key sources of potassium, while fats and oils are an important source of vitamin E.

So, what can be done to address this issue?

While this study highlights teenage deficiencies in nutrient intake, it also offers some reassurance. Based on current dietary patterns, there seems to be little risk of excessive micronutrient intake, said the researchers.

They concluded that strategies aimed at increasing micronutrient intake among teenagers should focus on boosting intake rather than worrying about overconsumption. Such strategies must be carefully designed and monitored to ensure that they effectively consider the importance of meat and dairy foods to the nutrient intake of teenagers, but are also environmentally sustainable.

“Sufficient micronutrient intakes are crucial during the teenage years to promote optimal health and growth during this life stage and into adulthood, with key dietary habits also forming which have been shown to track into later life.”– Walsh NM, et al., 2024

Source: (1) Walsh NM, Flynn A, Walton J, Kehoe L. Optimal growth and development: are teenagers getting enough micronutrients from their diet? Proc Nutr Soc. 2024 Mar 4:1-9. doi: 10.1017/S002966512400017X.

Additional references
  1. (2) Daly AN, O’Sullivan EJ & Kearney JM (2022) Considerations for health and food choice in adolescents. Proc Nutr Soc 81, 75–86.
  2. (3) EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products Nutrition and Allergies (2017) Dietary reference values for nutrients summary report. EFSA Support Publ 14, e15121E.
  3. (4) Levine MA (2012) Assessing bone health in children and adolescents. na J Endocrinol Metab 16, S205–S212.
  4. (5) Carr AC & Maggini S (2017) Vitamin C and immune function. Nutr 9, 1211.
  5. (6) Zhao T, Liu S, Zhang R et al. (2022) Global burden of vitamin A deficiency in 204 countries and territories from 1990–2019. Nutrients 14, 950.
27 Jun 2024
6 min read
Echoes from ECO 2024 Expert interviews Weight management

Odysseas Androutsos – Dietary guidelines for childhood obesity

Androustos children children obesity dietary guidelines ECO obesity
Related posts
See More
Our Resources
Table of contents
Table of contents

YINI attended the 2024 ECO congress to gather scientific updates and expert’s advice on the role of diet and dairy in the management and prevention of obesity. The congress offered a great opportunity to meet with experts from various fields of expertise. Here Odysseas Androutsos, Associate Professor at the Department of Nutrition and Dietetics at the University of Thessaly, speaks about his work on the dietary guidelines for children.

Key messages:

  • Childhood obesity has significantly increased over the past decade, necessitating urgent attention and the development of comprehensive guidelines by experts at ESDN Obesity, EFAD, and EASO for treating obesity in children and adolescents.
  • Effective obesity treatment plans for children and adolescents must prioritize a holistic, patient-centered approach, incorporating long-term strategies, medical nutrition therapy, and the inclusion of nutrient-dense foods like yogurt, fruits, and vegetables to support overall health and growth.
  • Dietitians can access the latest obesity treatment guidelines on the EASO and EFAD websites, and are encouraged to collaborate in multidisciplinary teams, gather feedback through qualitative research, and implement these evidence-based recommendations into daily practice to optimize patient outcomes.

Can you introduce yourself?

I’m an Associate Professor at the Department of Nutrition and Dietetics at the University of Thessaly and Director of the Lab of Clinical Nutrition and Dietetics.

You just gave your presentation at the ECO 2024. What should our readers know about your work?

Based on recent findings, it is evident that childhood obesity has significantly increased over the past decade. The prevalence of obesity in adolescence has quadrupled since the 1990s. According to the latest figures provided by the World Health Organization (WHO), 37 million children under the age of 5 and 390 million children and adolescents worldwide are overweight, with 160 million of them living with obesity.

The severity of this issue requires urgent attention. To address these rising trends, my colleagues and I at the European Specialist Dietetic Network (ESDN) Obesity, under the European Federation of the Associations of Dietitians (EFAD), in collaboration with the European Association for the Study of Obesity (EASO), have developed the latest guidelines for treating obesity in childhood and adolescence.

Could you outline the key principles recommended in these guidelines?

First and foremost, it is essential to recognize obesity as a disease. Therefore, healthcare professionals need to focus on intensive and long-term strategies to optimize treatment for young individuals. Instead of solely concentrating on weight loss or the maintenance of weight loss, we must consider patient-centered health outcomes. This holistic approach aims to achieve results that impact overall health and disease management.

Furthermore, through the implementation of these long-term and regular interventions, we emphasize medical nutrition therapy to maintain an energy deficit and sustain the weight loss achieved. Concurrently, our optimized approach ensures the provision of essential nutrients to develop healthy diet plans. These plans will not only lead to initial weight loss but also help in maintaining a healthy weight over time.

What are the key considerations and strategies for developing effective obesity treatment plans for children and adolescents?

While focusing on weight management, it is equally important to ensure that children and adolescents receive optimal nutritional intake to meet their requirements. This is crucial from our perspective. We must promote and incorporate low-energy, nutrient-dense foods, such as yogurt, fruits and vegetables, into their diet plans. Replacing energy-dense foods like salty snacks and sweets with healthier options is essential, not only during main meals but also in intermediate meals and breakfast.

Evidence from literature and our recommendations shows, for example, that increasing fruit intake by 0.5 servings and vegetable intake by 1.5 servings per day can be sustained over a long period. Our treatment approach must be personalized, as a one-size-fits-all strategy is ineffective. Specific, measurable, and time-related goals should be set for each patient to meet their unique needs and expectations.

Working in multidisciplinary teams is vital. Collaboration among pediatricians, dietitians, nutritionists, physical education experts, psychologists, and other professionals ensures optimal results. This team approach addresses psychological, social, and physical health aspects of obesity.

Role modeling is another crucial aspect. It extends beyond healthcare professionals to include families, parents, caregivers, teachers, and others in the child’s social environment. Promoting healthy role models is essential. Additionally, using non-stigmatizing, person-first language is important. We must respect and work individually with each person to optimize our efforts.

The care environment must be safe and welcoming, making children and adolescents feel comfortable and happy. These are the main pillars of creating a healthy environment for providing care. Overall, these are the core goals of the medical nutrition therapy described in our recommendations.

What is the place of dairy products in the guidelines, and more specifically yogurt?

Dairy products are an integral part of a healthy dietary pattern and should certainly be included when prescribing healthy diets for children. Their inclusion is not solely for the treatment of overweight or obesity; rather, dairy should be a regular component of the diet plan for all children and adolescents.

In the context of obesity treatment, dairy products provide essential nutrients crucial for growth in children and adolescents, such as proteins and calcium. Additionally, yogurt offers beneficial ferments that positively affect gut microbiota, which play a significant role in maintaining a healthy diet. Incorporating these microbial benefits is an important aspect of effective obesity treatment.

Do you have a message for dietitians on how they can effectively utilize these guidelines?

Dietitians looking to utilize these guidelines can easily access them. The guidelines are uploaded and freely available on the websites of EASO and EFAD. Anyone interested can simply click on the links to access the information. Our committee is also open to any questions and future networking opportunities to optimize the implementation of these recommendations.

Additionally, it is important to note that we are actively working with healthcare professionals to gather their feedback. Through qualitative research methods, such as interviews and focus groups, we are collecting their views and suggestions on how to enhance the implementation of these guidelines. While we have compiled the best available evidence, another crucial step is optimizing the guidelines’ uptake and integration into health systems across Europe, ensuring they are effectively implemented in daily practice.

References:

24 Jun 2024
5 min read
Echoes from ECO 2024 Expert interviews Weight management

Maria Hassapidou – Dietary Guidelines for Obesity in Europe

dietary guidelines ECO Hassapidou obesity
Related posts
See More
Our Resources
Table of contents
Table of contents

YINI attended the 2024 ECO congress to gather scientific updates and expert’s advice on the role of diet and dairy in the management and prevention of obesity. The congress offered a great opportunity to meet with experts from various fields of expertise. Here Maria Hassapidou, Professor of Nutrition and Dietetics at the Alexander Technological Educational Institution of Thessaloniki (Greece) tells us about her work on the dietary guidelines for Obesity in Europe.

Key messages:

  • The newly developed dietary guidelines emphasize treating comorbidities and improving overall health, rather than solely focusing on weight loss or reducing BMI, to provide a holistic approach to obesity management for both adults and children.
  • The guidelines are based on extensive research and collaboration with international experts, incorporating evidence-based recommendations for various diets and food groups, including evidence-based support for the health benefits of vegetables and dairy products, including yogurt.
  • These guidelines are freely accessible online through the EASO and EFAD websites, and we are actively working to disseminate them through workshops and webinars to ensure widespread awareness and implementation among health professionals.

Can you introduce yourself?

I am a Professor of Nutrition and Dietetics at the International Hellenic University in Thessaloniki, Greece, and I chair the ESDN Obesity of EFAD, the specialized dietetic group on obesity of the European Federation of the Association of Dietitians. Additionally, I co-chair the Nutrition Working Group of the European Association for the Study of Obesity (EASO).

For the past decade, our collaboration between dietitians and obesity experts has been immensely beneficial. This synergy between the two groups was instrumental in the joint publication of the guidelines.

During the Congress, we observed that a multidisciplinary approach is crucial for managing obesity. Can you share the method used to develop the dietary guidelines?

As I mentioned during my presentation, our journey began with an EU umbrella project, providing an opportunity to develop dietary guidelines for obesity, particularly focusing on medical nutrition therapy. We conducted surveys across Europe to assess the existing guidelines and published comparative studies to identify similarities and differences. This process highlighted the need for unified European guidelines, which was strongly supported by scientists and healthcare professionals across various countries.

To address this, we collaborated between EFAD and EASO, forming working and writing groups. We conducted a systematic literature review, drawing heavily on the comprehensive Canadian guidelines for obesity treatment. By extending their methodology up to 2023 and sharing our findings with our Canadian colleagues, we benefited greatly from this collaboration. Simultaneously, we developed guidelines for children with obesity, incorporating significant contributions from Australian researchers and maintaining the same rigorous methodology.

Our guidelines categorize the strength of evidence into various grades and levels based on the methods used. I hope, as I mentioned, that we have produced a well-received consensus document. Initial feedback from dietitians and the European Federation Association has been positive, but it will take time to evaluate the practical implementation and effectiveness of these guidelines.

What are according to you the main highlights from these dietary guidelines?

As I mentioned during my presentation, the key point of these guidelines for both adults and children is the emphasis on treating comorbidities. These guidelines are not solely focused on weight loss or reducing BMI: their primary goal is to improve overall health. Medical nutrition therapy aims to reduce comorbidities, making health improvement the main objective. Different diets are graded based on evidence, demonstrating their effectiveness in reducing factors like cholesterol or blood pressure. While losing weight is important, maintaining overall health is paramount.

Another important aspect is the grading of different diets. We have gathered extensive information, including evidence on specific food groups. Common questions often revolve around the effects of particular foods, such as nuts or vegetables. For example, there is strong evidence that increasing vegetable intake can help reduce body weight. A significant focus of the guidelines is dedicated to food groups, with particular interest in dairy products.

Regarding dairy, we have a specific recommendation based on evidence. There was a substantial number of studies showing positive results for certain health parameters related to dairy consumption. Overall, the inclusion of dairy, and specifically yogurt, is supported by evidence in our guidelines.

In March 2024, the FDA accepted a qualified health claim on the preventive role of yogurt in type 2 diabetes. Is it something that could lead to an update of dietary guidelines?

There are European guidelines for diabetes that are updated every few years, managed by specialists in that field. Our focus is on obesity, so I can’t provide specific data on diabetes. However, as a nutritionist, I can say that yogurt plays a significant role in the microbiota, which is related to both obesity and diabetes. The type of yogurt matters, and there is substantial evidence supporting its benefits through physiological mechanisms.

Where or how can dietitians find the guidelines?

Dietitians can access our guidelines by downloading the free papers available online. They are also accessible on the EASO and EFAD websites. To encourage their use, we are planning workshops and webinars for health professionals to ensure they are aware of these guidelines. These efforts are being made through EASO, EFAD, and national associations. While it will take some time for the guidelines to be fully integrated, initial feedback from health professionals, especially dietitians, has been very positive, and they have expressed their intention to use them.

References:

24 Jun 2024
5 min read
Echoes from ECO 2024 Expert interviews

Michele Sculati: Evolution of the dietary medical approach of obesity

GLP1 liver MASH microbiota NASH obesity sculati yogurt
Related posts
See More
Our Resources
Table of contents
Table of contents

YINI attended the 2024 ECO congress to gather scientific updates and expert’s advice on the role of diet and dairy in the management and prevention of obesity. The congress offered a great opportunity to meet with experts from various fields of expertise.

Here Dr Michele Sculati, Medical Doctor, Clinical Nutrition Specialist, PhD Public Health in Italy, speaks about the significance of addressing obesity with a comprehensive approach that includes newly available drugs, lifestyle changes, dietary adjustments, and the beneficial roles of prebiotics, probiotics, and fermented foods on the gut microbiota.

Key messages:

  • Personalized dietary prescriptions and new drugs are crucial for effective obesity treatment, emphasizing the importance of tailoring diets to individual needs and habits.
  • Recent research highlights the significant role of the microbiota in weight regulation and liver health, with diets rich in fiber and probiotics, like yogurt, showing promising benefits.
  • The FDA’s recognition of yogurt’s role in preventing type 2 diabetes underscores its potential health benefits, supported by decades of research linking yogurt consumption to lower diabetes risk and overall healthier dietary habits.

Can you introduce yourself?

I am a medical doctor specializing in Clinical Nutrition, with a strong focus on diet and dietotherapy, areas typically managed by dietitians. My passion lies in understanding how food and dietary habits can influence our health. Additionally, I have a deep interest in endocrinology and metabolism. This Congress, the ECO 2024, covers many of these topics extensively, making it an exciting and relevant event for me.

What do you believe are the key learnings from the ECO 2024 Congress?

There are numerous key messages to consider, given that the scientific program is an extensive 300-page document! Obesity has garnered significant interest, particularly with the advent of new treatment results. One of the most discussed topics is the efficacy of new drugs, including not only GLP-1 inhibitors but also others GP inhibitors and emerging medications. Currently, we have around 20 new molecules in development, making it possible to treat obesity with drugs, in addition to surgery.

However, prescribing drugs alone is not sufficient. When treating a patient with obesity, it’s crucial to remember that better results are achieved if the patient’s habits are changed. Therefore, a nutritionist or medical doctor treating obesity should emphasize the importance of personalized dietary prescriptions. These prescriptions should be tailored to the patient’s needs and habits, ensuring they are practical and achievable in real life. This includes considering the patient’s taste preferences, food preparation time, daily schedule, and activities such as sports or the use of lunch boxes.

Beyond the combination of drug development, clinical approaches and personalized dietary prescriptions, are there new targets in obesity research?

An area of growing interest among scientists is how dietary habits affect the microbiota, which plays a significant role in weight regulation. The microbiota aids in regulating weight through GLP-1. A diet rich in fiber and a healthy microbiota can lead to the production of short-chain fatty acids. These acids stimulate G protein on enterocytes, which in turn promotes the secretion of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), the same target as many GLP analog drugs.

In recent years, there has been a shift towards prescribing diets that positively impact the microbiota by enhancing the fermentation of short-chain fatty acids. This can be achieved through diet, prebiotics, and probiotics. Probiotics are not limited to pills or supplements but can also be found in foods like yogurt, which naturally contain probiotics.

Many foods have potential probiotics. However, the way we cook, prepare, and store these foods affects their probiotic content. In contrast, yogurt is a standardized food with known probiotic content and substantial scientific backing.

Based on the sessions you attended here at ECO 2024, can you think of new benefits yogurt may bring to the microbiota?

Definitely! For example, I attended sessions on Metabolically Associated Steatohepatitis (MASH), previously known as Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH). These sessions highlighted the connection between the microbiota and the liver. Poorly differentiated microbiota, lacking healthy taxa, can lead to a thinner mucus layer in the gut, causing a condition known as leaky gut. This allows chemicals like lipopolysaccharides to pass through enterocytes into the bloodstream, reaching the liver directly.

Lipopolysaccharides impact inflammation mediators in the liver, contributing to chronic inflammation associated with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and MASH. Once again, as previously stated, modulating the microbiota through dietary habits and probiotics can play a crucial role in managing these conditions.

In March, the FDA accepted a claim that yogurt can help prevent type 2 diabetes. How significant is this claim for clinicians, and will it impact their recommendation of yogurt?

This claim is the result of decades of research, marking a significant milestone. I don’t believe any other food has such a strong claim related to a globally prevalent health issue like type 2 diabetes, making this incredibly important.

It’s not just based on a few years of research; it’s the culmination of extensive studies. While the FDA doesn’t consider the evidence entirely conclusive, the claim they approved is still very strong. We know there’s a negative association between yogurt consumption and the incidence of diabetes: the more yogurt you consume, the lower your risk of developing diabetes.

The exact reasons for this observation are still under investigation. It could be due to bioactive peptides in yogurt or its influence on the microbiota. As mentioned earlier, diet can affect the endogenous secretion of GLP-1, which was initially developed as a drug for diabetes therapy. This might give us some insight into why these observations occur.

Besides diabetes, yogurt offers numerous benefits: it is a nutrient-dense food, which likely explains the negative association between yogurt consumption and BMI. Additionally, yogurt consumption is associated with overall healthy dietary habits.

20 Jun 2024
6 min read
Q&A

Focus on vitamin D

bones calciferol calcium immunity nutrient vitamin D
Related posts
See More
Our Resources
Table of contents
Table of contents

Vitamin D is an essential vitamin for elements such as bones, teeth and the immune system. It is present in fortified dairy but many people do not consume enough. Let’s focus on it.

What is vitamin D?

Vitamin D is a fat-soluble vitamin. It exists on 2 different forms, D2 (ergocalciferol), mainly produced by some plants and D3 (cholecalciferol). The human body synthesizes vitamin D3 in the skin, under the effect of ultraviolet rays.

Vitamin D is known for its significant role in calcium homeostasis and metabolism but it plays a multitude of effects on the body besides bones and calcium metabolism by contributing to:

  • the normal function of the immune system
  • inflammatory response
  • muscle functions

The roles of vitamin D

Vitamin D promotes healthy bones by aiding calcium absorption through modulation of active transport absorption and maintaining a good ratio of calcium and phosphate for bone mineralisation.

It reduces inflammation, modulates cell growth, glucose metabolism, neuromuscular and immune function through the modulation of genes encoding proteins that regulate these processes.

functions of vitamin D - YINI

A chronic deficiency in vitamin D leads to improper bone mineralisation, as less calcium and phosphorous are absorbed in the small intestine and can induce hypocalcaemia (low levels of calcium in the blood) and phosphaturia (phosphate in urine) causing accelerated bone demineralization. This can result in bone mineralisation diseases such as osteomalacia, osteoporosis, and rickets in children. Adequate levels of vitamin D combined with calcium can help prevent these diseases.

Vitamin D consumed in the diet is absorbed through passive diffusion in the gut and this absorption is enhanced by fat.

Diet recommendations

Vitamin D is synthesised by the skin when exposed to UV light. However, the amount synthesised depends on a multitude of factors such as where you live, weather, skin melanin levels, and wearing sunscreen.

Diet recommendations usually assume skin endogenous production of vitamin D is equal to 0 to ensure guidelines provide enough vitamin D through diet alone. The recommended daily intake is 15µg per day for adults. The ability of the body to produce and absorb vitamin D decreases with age which is why this recommendation increases to 20µg per day for people over the age of 70.

It is important not to consume too much vitamin D because excess vitamin D in the body is toxic and can lead to symptoms such as headache, nausea and vomiting, weight loss or fatigue. It is recommended to not consume more than 100µg per day. However, this happens almost only in cases of supplement overuse and it is not something the majority of the population has to worry about. In fact, most people fall short of meeting recommended intakes. In the USA, over 90% of adults do not consume enough vitamin D and this is similar in most northern hemisphere countries.

Dietary sources of vitamin D

Dietary sources of vitamin D are quite rare. Some vitamin D can be found in fatty fish, fish liver oils, beef liver, egg yolk, cheese and fortified dairy. For example, in the USA, almost all milk is fortified with vitamin D and it is compulsory in Canada.

Some mushrooms can have vitamin D if they are treated with UV light which makes the mushroom produce vitamin D.

Dietary sources of vitamin D - YINI

Vitamin D in dairy

As dairy products are often fortified in vitamin D, it is a major source of this nutrient for populations. For example, in France, 25% of vitamin D intake comes from dairy products.

Dairy products were chosen to be fortified as it doesn’t change the taste and it also helps in absorbing the high content of calcium and ensure healthy bones.

Fortified dairy products are an interesting source of vitamin D as they provide a large portion of the dietary recommendation.

Data from the USA National Health Nutrition and Examination Survey (NHANES), the Canadian Community Health Survey, and the UK National Diet and Nutrition Survey show that yogurt consumers have higher daily intakes of several key nutrients including vitamin D.

Research shows that people that consume yogurt have stronger bones and lower bone resorption markers. In older adults, yogurt consumption is linked to increased bone mineral density and physical function. Therefore, encouraging older people to eat yogurt more often, particularly vitamin D- and calcium-fortified yogurt, may be a valuable public health strategy to stave off osteoporosis.

See also

Sources
13 Jun 2024
6 min read
Echoes from ECO 2024 Expert interviews Weight management

Niamh Arthurs: Food habits among children and adolescent with obesity

Arthurs children dairy ECO2024 obesity
Related posts
See More
Our Resources
Table of contents
Table of contents

YINI attended the 2024 ECO congress to gather scientific updates and expert’s advice on the role of diet and dairy in the management and prevention of obesity. The congress offered a great opportunity to meet with experts from various fields of expertise. Here Niam Arthurs, pediatric dietitian and researcher in the area of child and adolescent obesity based in Dublin, Ireland, speaks about her research on child obesity.

Key messages:

  • Understanding children’s and parents’ eating habits is crucial for creating effective, personalized dietary treatments for childhood obesity.
  • The study aims at allowing dietitians to identify key target points such as the fact that many children and teenagers are not meeting the recommended daily intakes for calcium.
  • Addressing misinformation and providing evidence-based recommendations, such as the FDA claim about the role of yogurt in the prevention of type 2 diabetes, can help dietitians’ design personalized dietary treatments, especially in the context of childhood obesity.

 

Can you introduce yourself and tell us what you work on?

I’m a senior pediatric dietitian and researcher in the area of child and adolescent obesity based in Dublin, Ireland. My team works on food habits among children with obesity. Our main objective is to gather intelligence about our young patients’ habits before implementing any obesity treatment in order to maximize the effectiveness of personalized dietary approaches.

Firstly, we examine the nutritional quality of children’s reported food and fluid intakes. For this specific aspect, we use a 28-item food frequency questionnaire, conducted with the parents.

Secondly we evaluate the level of parental knowledge about nutrition, their self-reported cooking confidence and their relationship to food consumption. Ultimately, these elements guide us in determining the relationship between parental nutritional knowledge and children’s dietary habits. That is the basis for tailoring personalized treatment.

What have you learned about personalized dietary treatment for children with obesity using this method?

Getting a baseline idea about what children and teenagers are actually eating, combined with parents’ nutrition knowledge and their ease with cooking preparations allowed us to avoid making assumptions about children’s environments. This truly helped us make the connection between gathered information and its relationship with food consumption.

Our study found that parents who reported lower levels of cooking confidence tended to have households with higher consumption of convenience meals and takeaway foods. For dietitians aiming at framing their patients’ specific needs, such elements represent key targets for designing their interventions.

Assessing levels of knowledge in nutrition also enables understanding of general food and nutrient recommendations knowledge. We observed that the consumption of dairy products was a lot lower than the recommended amounts, in all age groups. From 5- to 88-year-olds, only about over 50% of the studied population met the recommended daily intakes for dairy products.

In Ireland, dairy products are the main source of calcium in children’s and teenagers’ diets. This nutrient is of pivotal importance during this age of growth. However, none of the 9- to 16-year-olds included in the survey met the recommended daily intakes for calcium, from either dairy products or other calcium-rich foods.

Again, the study aims at identifying such key target points to let dietitians design relevant interventions.

How do these results translate in your day-to-day consultation?

Expanding on the earlier example of calcium deficiency, the study highlighted that our interventions need to focus more on dairy products. This implies addressing the myths around dairy products and exploring with the families the reasons why they do not consume enough dairy products, particularly children and teenagers.

In this instance, it appears that a lot of the parents simply do not know what the recommendations for dairy foods are – i.e. 3 portions of dairy foods per day from up to 8 years, and 5/day after 8 years old, in Ireland – nor what a serving size corresponds to.

That information is crucial for health and nutrition literacy, and we need to incorporate it more into our one-on-one consultations and group education programs to ensure that individuals are receiving adequate levels of necessary knowledge.

Do you provide them with simple ways to incorporate more dairy into their meals?

This is where tailoring comes in. It’s important to understand what children and teenagers are currently eating to make small, specific suggestions for incorporating more dairy. For example, many children begin skipping breakfast when they transition from primary to secondary school, often due to time constraints or lack of appetite. However, breakfast is an important opportunity to consume calcium-rich foods.

We can suggest alternatives such as eating something once they get to school or choosing quicker options for the morning to overcome time barriers. Additionally, they can incorporate more calcium-rich foods into their lunch. For instance, they could add cheese to their sandwiches or bring pouch yogurts, which are convenient and less likely to burst in their bags. Drinkable yogurts are also a good option. These types of recommendations are often more acceptable and practical for their routines.

In March 2024, the FDA published a qualified health claim about the role of yogurt in the prevention of type 2 diabetes. Can this have an impact on the recommendations? Do you think it can be an opportunity for patients?

It’s incredibly valuable to have strong, evidence-based claims because there’s so much misinformation surrounding dairy foods. For instance, myths about dairy contributing to acne, containing hormones, or causing inflammation are not supported by scientific evidence. Unfortunately, the science community isn’t reaching these target groups effectively. Families are increasingly getting their information from social media, so we need to be much louder in our communication. Having well-supported claims can help us do that.

Moreover, these claims are particularly significant in our world today, where we face rising rates and high prevalence of conditions like type 2 diabetes. These conditions can severely impact an individual’s quality of life and health if not properly managed. Strong, scientifically-backed claims not only help us communicate more effectively but also attract media attention. This can encourage individuals, families, and teenagers who might be avoiding calcium-rich foods, such as dairy products, to reconsider their choices.

10 Jun 2024
6 min read
Benefits for planet health

Should all ultra-processed foods be categorised under one umbrella?

diet health NOVA Ultraprocessed food
Related posts
See More
Our Resources
Table of contents
Table of contents

Eating ultra-processed foods is linked to the risk of developing long-term health problems, according to the latest evidence from an umbrella study conducted by an international team of researchers (1).

But questions remain on just how much do these ready-to-eat products affect our well-being and should they all be assessed under the same umbrella.

An umbrella approach to assessing ultra-processed food effects

A growing body of evidence suggests that eating certain ultra-processed foods may affect our risk of developing chronic diseases (2). However, while multiple meta-analyses have examined observational studies on the associations between ultra-processed foods and health outcomes, no one has carried out a comprehensive data review. Until now…

To bridge the gap, researchers from Australia, France, Ireland, and the USA set out to test the strength of evidence relating to the link between ultra-processed foods and health. They performed an umbrella review of data from 14 meta-analyses in nearly 10 million participants, evaluating a range of health outcomes including mortality, cancer, and mental health, respiratory, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, and metabolic disorders. Here’s what they found…

Overall, ultra-processed foods are associated with poor health outcomes

Eating more ultra-processed foods (UPFs) was consistently associated with a higher risk of adverse health outcomes. However, the strength of evidence varied, and the quality of evidence was generally low, pointing to a need for further robust research.

Among the most convincing evidence, the study found that greater consumption of ultra-processed foods was linked to higher risks of cardiovascular disease-related mortality, common mental disorder outcomes, and type 2 diabetes.

UPFs were also associated with all-cause mortality, heart disease-related mortality, depressive outcomes, adverse sleep-related outcomes, wheezing, and obesity. The researchers found weak or no evidence for connections with other conditions including cancer-related deaths, asthma, and ulcerative colitis.

Ultra-processing can alter the nutrient composition and matrix effects of foods

So, what are the mechanisms behind the link between ultra-processed foods and poor health outcomes? Evidence indicates that ultra-processed foods differ from unprocessed foods in several ways:

  • UPFs differ from unprocessed or minimally-processed foods and often have poorer nutrient profiles.
  • They may displace more nutritious foods in diets, resulting in a reduce intake of beneficial bioactive compounds (3).
  • As a result, diets rich in UPFs are associated with markers of poor diet quality, such as high levels of added sugars, saturated fat, and sodium, high energy density and low levels of fiber, protein, and micronutrients (3).
  • Finally, processing, ingredients or by-products can cause alterations to the food matrix – the physical and chemical structure of foods – which may affect digestion, nutrient absorption, and feelings of satiety (4).

Different types of ultra-processed foods may have different health effects

One limitation of umbrella reviews is that they tend to provide only a high-level overview – for example, this study did not consider possible differences in the effects of various types of ultra-processed food on chronic disease outcomes.

For example, a meta-analysis included in this umbrella review found that while eating certain types of UPF was associated with a higher risk of type 2 diabetes, other types – such as cereals, dark/wholegrain bread, packaged savoury snacks, fruit-based products, yogurt and dairy-based desserts – were associated with a lower risk (5).

These findings demonstrate the complexity of relationships between ultra-processed foods consumption and health outcomes and highlight the need for further research to understand the mechanisms behind potential associations:

  • For some experts, understanding the differences between types of UPFs and within subcategories of UPFs may help consumers to adopt healthier dietary patterns, compared to maximally reducing their consumption on the whole.
  • Others propose to focus on the overall quality of the diet, based on the hypothesis that a high-calorie diet, consisting of foods that are not nutrient-dense, may be harmful for health, which is confirmed by this approach that considers UPFs.

As we still do not have enough knowledge on this subject, it is necessary to look at the overall quality of the diet and the health effects across the subgroups within the NOVA category,

“Although our umbrella review provides a systematic synthesis of the role of ultra-processed dietary patterns in chronic disease outcomes, a related consideration is the possible heterogeneity of associations between subgroups and subcategories of ultra-processed foods and chronic disease outcomes”– Lane MM, et al., 2024

How do we define ultra-processed foods?

Ultra-processed foods, encompass a broad range of ready-to-eat products including packaged snacks, carbonated soft drinks, instant noodles, or ready-made meals (6). They are defined by the following characteristics (7):

  • Primarily composed of chemically modified substances extracted from foods
  • Contain additives to enhance taste, texture, appearance, and durability

While various systems have been developed to classify foods on the basis of processing, the most commonly used is the Nova food classification system (8). Nova has received recognition from global health and nutrition bodies including the United Nations and the World Health Organization. However, the Nova classification system has also received criticism, with concerns raised about possible imprecision and inconsistencies.

For more information on food processing, see Food processing explained.

Source: (1) Lane MM, Gamage E, Du S, et al. Ultra-processed food exposure and adverse health outcomes: umbrella review of epidemiological meta-analyses. BMJ. 2024 Feb 28:384:e077310.
Additional references
  1. (2) Chassaing B. Ultra-processed foods and human health: from epidemiological evidence to mechanistic insights. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022;7:1128-40.
  2. (3) Martini D, Godos J, Bonaccio M, Vitaglione P, Grosso G. Ultra-Processed Foods and Nutritional Dietary Profile: A Meta-Analysis of Nationally Representative Samples. Nutrients 2021;13:3390
  3. (4) Fardet A. Minimally processed foods are more satiating and less hyperglycemic than ultra-processed foods: a preliminary study with 98 ready-to-eat foods. Food Funct 2016;7:2338-46.
  4. (5) Chen Z, Khandpur N, Desjardins C, et al. Ultra-Processed Food Consumption and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes: Three Large Prospective U.S. Cohort Studies. Diabetes Care 2023;46:1335-44.
  5. (6) Monteiro CA, Cannon G, Lawrence M, et al. Ultra-processed foods, diet quality, and health using the NOVA classification system. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Food and Agriculture Organization, 2019.
  6. (7) Monteiro CA, Cannon G, Levy RB, et al. Ultra-processed foods: what they are and how to identify them. Public Health Nutr 2019;22:936-41.
  7. (8) Monteiro CA, Cannon G, Moubarac J-C, Levy RB, Louzada MLC, Jaime PC. The UN Decade of Nutrition, the NOVA food classification and the trouble with ultra-processing. Public Health Nutr 2018;21:5-17.
03 Jun 2024
6 min read
by YINI Editorial team
Non classé Nutri-dense food Publications

Yogurt is a nutrient-rich food

NRF Nutrient density nutrient richness yogurt
Related posts
See More
Our Resources
Table of contents
Table of contents

Yogurt contains both micronutrients – vitamins and minerals – and macronutrients, including proteins and fatty acids.

Yogurt contains high-quality protein, including all nine essential amino acids in the proportions needed for protein synthesis.

Yogurt is a rich source of calcium, providing up to 20% of daily calcium intake per 116 g or ~4-ounce portion (one average pot).

Yogurt also provides smaller amounts of many other micronutrients, including potassium, zinc, phosphorus, magnesium, iodine, vitamin A, riboflavin (vitamin B2), vitamin B5, vitamin B12 and in some countries, vitamin D.

Yogurt consumption helps meet nutrient intake requirements

Yogurt and other dairy products contribute to key nutrient intakes for adults and children. That is why most regional and national food-based dietary guidelines recommend the consumption of dairy products – and, when amounts are specified, two or three servings per day are typically recommended.

Adults

Many people fall short of meeting recommended intakes of certain nutrients in their diet. Close to 30% of men and 60% of women in the USA do not consume enough calcium and >90% do not consume enough vitamin D. Deficiencies of several nutrients persist in the Middle East, North Africa and Central Asia including calcium, vitamins A, D, B12 and zinc.
Yogurt contributes many of these nutrients. For example, 125 g (~4 ounces) of plain yogurt provides, among other nutrients, 20% of an adult’s recommended daily intake of calcium, 21% of riboflavin, 11% of vitamin B12, and 16% of phosphorus.

Data from the USA National Health Nutrition and Examination Survey (NHANES), the Canadian Community Health Survey, and the UK National Diet and Nutrition Survey show that yogurt consumers have higher daily intakes of several key nutrients including riboflavin, vitamin C, folate, vitamin D, potassium, iron, magnesium and calcium.

Contribution of yogurt to daily energy and nutrient intake - YINI
Nutrient inadequacy in yogurt consumers versus non-consumers - YINI


Furthermore, regular yogurt eaters are more likely to meet or exceed nutrient recommendations for vitamins and minerals including vitamin A, riboflavin, folate, potassium, calcium, magnesium, zinc and iodine

“Yogurt is a nutrient-dense food containing a wide range of macro and micro-nutrients. Eating yogurt every day can help us meet our recommended levels of several key nutrients.”

Professor Frans Kok

Children

Good diet quality is important for children and adolescents to support growth and development.
Teenagers are especially at risk of nutrient shortfall, and vitamin D, calcium, potassium, fibre and iron are of particular concern. Yogurt is a valuable part of a balanced nutrient-rich diet during childhood, contributing a substantial percentage of a child’s needs for micronutrients and macronutrients.

Data from the USA NHANES show that increasing dairy food consumption (milk, cheese and yogurt) to meet the recommended level in the USA for adolescents of three servings per day can make up for the shortfall of three nutrients of public health concern – calcium, vitamin D and potassium.

The UK survey data suggest that adding a 125 g (~4 ounces) pot of low-fat fruit yogurt per day to adolescents’ diets would increase mean calcium intake from below to above the Recommended Nutrient Intake.

Yogurt’s contribution to total and added sugar intake is relatively low

The World Health Organization recommends limiting the consumption of non-milk extrinsic sugars – which include those added to food by manufacturers or by consumers – to a maximum of 10% energy intake. However, many people in Western societies are exceeding this threshold.

Concerns that sweetened yogurt contributes to these excess sugar intakes are not supported by the scientific data. In the USA, a NHANES analysis found that flavoured yogurt contributes about 1% of added sugars to the diets of adults. This compared with 28.1% from soft drinks.

Added sugar intake increases throughout childhood and amounts to 15% of total daily energy intake among adolescents. While more than 50% of total sugars and 66% of added sugars in children’s diets come from sweet products such as cakes, sweets and sugary drinks, yogurt accounts for only 1–8% of total sugars and 4–9% of added sugar in children’s diets in Europe.

References:

27 May 2024
6 min read
Benefits for planet health

Evaluating milk and plant-based drinks

dairy milk plant-based drinks sustainable diet
Related posts
See More
Our Resources
Table of contents
Table of contents

Sustainable dietary choices depend not only on carbon footprints per unit mass, but should consider an overall perspective including lowest “societal cost”, nutrient content and retail price, study reveals. Taking this broader perspective may change the optimal sustainable dietary choices.

Many people think of sustainable foods as those that simply have a small carbon footprint. But when it comes to advising them about their planet-friendly food choices, a much more complex picture is emerging, say researchers from The Netherlands. They’ve taken a deep dive into the sustainability profiles of foods, using semi skimmed milk and plant-based beverages as case studies – with unexpected results.

Their findings provide fresh insights that will empower consumers and healthcare professionals to make informed decisions in the pursuit of a healthier and more sustainable future.

The research also underscores the importance of adopting a holistic approach when evaluating the sustainability of dietary choices, incorporating nutritional content, environmental impact and economic costs associated with foods and drinks.

For example, it’s not just the food’s composition that matters: the availability and uptake of nutrients in the body and the potential synergistic effects of components in the food matrix may also play a crucial role.

Mounting concerns over climate change drive the pursuit of sustainable diets

As concerns mount over climate change, the search for more sustainable food systems is becoming more intense. One manifestation of this is the drive to switch away from animal-based proteins towards more plant-based proteins.

The improvement in sustainability tends to be measured by the greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs), and generally plant-based alternatives have smaller footprints than cow’s milk [2]. But it’s not as simple as measuring emissions in relation to weight of a food product, say the researchers. Because of the lower nutrient density of many dairy alternatives, the gap narrows when considering emission per amount of nutrients [3].

Environmental impacts of food products have many variables. For dairy milk, GHGs can vary according to the production chain, the geographical region, and milk production per cow [4]. Similarly, the carbon footprint of plant-based alternatives varies between regions, depending on their source, yield per hectare, energy used, and soil treatment.

Multiple components are needed to build a sustainability profile

With this in mind, the researchers used multiple criteria to build full sustainability profiles of semi-skimmed cow’s milk and several plant-based beverages in both fortified and non-fortified formulations – including oat, soy, rice, coconut, and almond drinks. For one serving of each product, they assessed the Nutrient Rich Food (NRF) score, protein digestibility, and essential amino acid content.

Next, they calculated the true price of each product, converting carbon footprints to euros using the European Union Emissions Trading System, and adding them to supermarket prices. The environmental costs were based on GHGs associated with production, land use, and water consumption. These environmental impacts were assessed throughout the entire life cycle of each beverage, from raw material extraction and production, to distribution and consumption.

“The comprehensive method used, which considers retail price, environmental costs, and nutrient content, demonstrates that, in terms of sustainability, choosing a serving of semi-skimmed milk remains the optimal choice. Following this, soy-based beverages represent the next best alternative.‘’ – de Jong P, et al., 2024

Cow’s milk and plant-based drinks each have advantages

The carbon footprint of plant-based beverages is lower per unit mass than that of semi-skimmed milk. However, the analysis showed that to achieve the same NRF score the consumer would need to drink more servings of unfortified plant-based beverages than semi-skimmed milk, resulting in larger carbon footprints. The exception was soy drink – but when emerging farm practices were taken into account, semi-skimmed milk and soy drinks showed similar carbon footprints for a given NRF score.

Among fortified plant-based beverages, the nutrient-based footprint of soy, oat, and almond beverages was smaller than that of semi-skimmed milk, while coconut and rice had larger footprints. These findings underscore the need for plant-based beverages to be fortified to achieve a reasonable sustainability footprint, the researchers say.

When combining the economic costs of environmental impact with the price consumers have to pay for these products, semi-skimmed milk emerged as the best choice.

A mix of plant- and animal-sourced foods for the future diets

The findings suggest that, although popular as an alternative to milk, plant-based beverages should not necessarily be seen as a replacement for cow’s milk. If people consume plant-based drinks without compensating with other food sources, they risk having insufficient nutrient intake [5-8].

Soy seems to have the highest potential to become a basis for sustainable plant-based drinks, in addition to cow’s milk.

Semi-skimmed milk belongs to the group of food products with the best value for money.

In reality, the growing world population implies that we need to find best use of available land and future diets are likely to contain a mix of plant-based and animal-based foods. It’s also important to remember that the bioactivity of nutrients is influenced by other components in the food matrix. For example, lactose in cow’s milk boosts the bioactivity of calcium and other minerals, whereas sugars in plants do not, the researchers say.

Sustainable dietary guidelines should not only recommend foods with lower carbon emissions per unit mass, but take time to consider the broader perspective including national values. The researchers call for more research to learn how the food matrix modulates nutrient bioavailability and effectiveness.

“The research underscores that understanding a food product’s nutritional value requires more than knowledge of its composition; uptake into the body maintenance and potential synergistic effects of other components in the food matrix play crucial roles.” – de Jong P, et al., 2024

Source: (1) de Jong P, Woudstra F, van Wilk AN. Sustainability Evaluation of Plant-Based Beverages and Semi-Skimmed Milk Incorporating Nutrients, Market Prices, and Environmental Costs. Sustainability 2024, 16(5), 1919
Additional references
  1. (2) Clune, S.; Crossin, E.; Verghese, K. Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories.  Clean. Prod.2017, 140, 766–783.
  2. (3) Drewnowski, A.; Rehm, C.D.; Martin, A.; Verger, E.O.; Voinnesson, M.; Imbert, P. Energy and nutrient density of foods in relation to their carbon footprint.  J. Clin. Nutr.2015, 101, 184–191.
  3. (4) Adewale, C.; Reganold, J.P.; Higgins, S.; Evans, R.D.; Carpenter-Boggs, L. Agricultural carbon footprint is farm specific: Case study of two organic farms.  Clean. Prod.2019, 229, 795–805.
  4. (5) Kalyn, M.; Collard, M.D.; David, P.; McCormick, M.D. A nutritional comparison of cow’s milk and alternative milk products.  Pediatr.2020, 21, 1067–1069.
  5. (6) Walther, B.; Guggisberg, D.; Badertscher, R.; Egger, L.; Portmann, R.; Dubois, S.; Haldimann, M.; Kopf-Bolanz, K.; Rhyn, P.; Zoller, O.; et al. Comparison of nutritional composition between plant-based drinks and cow’s milk.  Nutr.2022, 9, 988707.
  6. (7) Chalupa-Krebzdak, S.; Long, C.J.; Bohrer, B.M. Nutrient density and nutritional value of milk and plant-based milk alternatives.  Dairy J.2018, 87, 84–92.
  7. (8) Fulgoni, V.L.; Keast, D.R.; Auestad, N.; Quann, E.E. Nutrients from dairy foods are difficult to replace in diets of Americans: Food pattern modeling and an analyses of the national health and nutrition examination survey 2003-2006.  Res.2011, 31, 759–765.
20 May 2024
6 min read
Athletes Gut Health

Exploring the microbial secrets behind athletic excellence

Athlete microbiota SCFA sport
Related posts
See More
Our Resources
Table of contents
Table of contents

A new study has shed light on the link between the gut microbiome and athletic performance. The research has revealed that athletes have their own microbiome “signature”, and indicates that certain microbiome features are associated with improved physical prowess [1] .

By unlocking the secrets of the microbial world within the gut, such research may pave the way towards innovative approaches that harness the relationship between microbiome and physiological function. It could lead to changes in sport nutrition and performance enhancement.

The gut microbiota – a community of little helpers

How well people perform as athletes profoundly depends on what’s happening on a microscopic scale in the gut. That’s because each one of us is a walking ecosystem of human cells and gut microbial cells working symbiotically to determine our health and wellbeing. Among the metabolites produced by the community of 10-100 trillion gut microbes are short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) [2] that contribute to gut homeostasis, modulate the immune system, and even influence brain function [3].

But the microbiome is a sensitive community, influenced by diet, age, stress, illness, and certain drug treatments [3,4,5]. And recent studies have shown that physical exercise is another influencer, enhancing the diversity and composition of the gut microbiome [6]. The evidence suggests that microbiome activity is linked to sports performance [7].

The characteristics of an athlete’s microbiome depend on their type of sport, previous research has suggested. Endurance training, such as marathon-running, increases the production of SCFAs – an advantage during prolonged activity as they contribute to energy maintenance – and to an abundance of microbiota species with anti-inflammatory properties. On the other hand, the microbial profile in strength-based sports enhances protein use to support muscle development and performance [8].

These findings have raised the question of whether each athlete’s abilities could be optimised by changing microbiome composition for targeted improvements in performance.

Identifying exercise-induced microbiome changes

Delving deeper into this possibility, the researchers compared changes in the microbiomes before and after exercise in three groups of healthy people: two athletic populations – strength athletes and endurance athletes – and a non-athletic but physically active control group [1]. The athletes were not competing at a professional level.

Each of the three groups performed two exercise bouts, separated by a 2-week period, to assess:

  • explosive and high intensity fitness using a repeated 30-second all-out activity on a cycle ergometer
  • cardiorespiratory fitness using a treadmill

Physical fitness is linked to improved microbiome diversity

Results showed that at the start of the study, the endurance, strength and control groups shared some common features in the microbiome, including similar levels of diversity and proportions of phyla – as could be expected for people who are fit and healthy. But one-third of the species identified were unique to each group.

Following exercise, all three groups showed changes in the microbiome profiles, with physical fitness improving microbial diversity. In this study, no marked differences emerged between the control, strength and endurance groups – probably because they were all similarly active, but not training on a professional level, the researchers say.

Longitudinal samples – taken pre- and post-exercise – revealed an abundance of Alistipes communis in the strength athletes during the high intensity fitness test. During the cardiorespiratory fitness test, 88 species showed differences between the three groups.

Among the bacterial species consistently found throughout the study, there were enhancements in two species that are short chain fatty acid producers, Bifidobacterium longum and Bifidobacterium adolescentis. These two probiotic species, which are commonly found in commercial products, both correlated with improvements in all the fitness parameters measured, especially cardiorespiratory fitness (measured as VO2max during the treadmill test).

Other bacterial types that were linked with higher VO2max included species associated with improved glucose metabolism.

“We were particularly excited to see an enrichment of indigestible carbohydrate degrading bacteria in the endurance group, thereby suggesting performance-specific adaptations.” – Humińska-Lisowska K et al., 2024

Further research

The study confirmed that taking exercise can be a hallmark of microbiome diversity, which in turn is an indicator of general good health, the researchers concluded.

However, they saw various individual responses, suggesting there may be many confounding factors. Hence their results highlight the intricate relationship between different forms of physical activity and expression of gut microbiota. To investigate this relationship further, the researchers recommended further studies to identify sport-specific microbiomes could include elite athletes who would be adapted to different aerobic or anaerobic activities, the researchers said.

“… Physical activity may be a hallmark of microbiome diversity, which correlates with general health and homeostasis maintenance.” – – Humińska-Lisowska K et al., 2024

Source: (1) Humińska-Lisowska K, Zielińska K, Mieszkowski J, Michałowska-Sawczyn M, Cięszczyk P, Łabaj PP, Wasąg B, Frączek B, Grzywacz A, Kochanowicz A, Kosciolek T. Microbiome features associated with performance measures in athletic and non-athletic individuals: A case-control study. PLoS One. 2024 Feb 21;19(2):e0297858.

Additional references

(2) Rios-Covian D, Ruas-Madiedo P, Margolles A, et al. Intestinal Short Chain Fatty Acids and their Link with Diet and Human Health. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2016, 7, 185.

(3). Sharon G, Sampson TR, Geschwind DH, Mazmanian SK. The Central Nervous System and the Gut Microbiome. Cell, 2016, 167(4), 915–932.

(4). Asnicar F, Berry SE, Valdes AM, et al. Microbiome connections with host metabolism and habitual diet from 1,098 deeply phenotyped individuals. Nat Med, 2021, 27, 321–332.

(5). Rinninella E, Raoul P, Cintoni M, et al. What is the Healthy Gut Microbiota Composition? A Changing Ecosystem across Age, Environment, Diet, and Diseases. Microorganisms.2019. 10;7(1):14.

(6). Allen JM, Mailing LJ, Niemiro GM, et al. Exercise Alters Gut Microbiota Composition and Function in Lean and Obese Humans. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2018,50(4):747–757.

(7). Mohr AE, Jäger R, Carpenter KC, et al. The athletic gut microbiota, Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, 12;17(1):24.

(8). Jang LG, Choi G, Kim SW, et al. The combination of sport and sport-specific diet is associated with characteristics of gut microbiota: an observational study. J Int Soc Sports Nutr. 2019. 3;16(1):21.